Bemused medic
banner
nicotinelozeng.bsky.social
Bemused medic
@nicotinelozeng.bsky.social
Cat valet
Elbows up
God is Mother Nature
Transgender people do not deserve persecution
No DMs please
FRCP / retired NHS cons phys
I assume you're unaware of this, a polite way of telling Shoo Lee he's an idiot:

www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u...
November 24, 2025 at 4:44 PM
Again?
November 20, 2025 at 12:46 PM
The man who helped to "wreck the UK's finances", via Brexit, has a new wheeze: blame everybody else.
November 3, 2025 at 9:30 AM
Hilarious stuff from McDonald. Letby will do as well as Michael Stone, another McDonald publicity stunt.
November 2, 2025 at 5:08 PM
Very weak, actually. It looks like he can't tell that Pochin is a racist.
October 29, 2025 at 2:02 PM
Luke Pollard.
October 29, 2025 at 1:34 PM
Starmer is claiming immigrants are in luxury hotels. Exactly like Farage.
October 29, 2025 at 12:23 PM
Christianity strikes again.
October 29, 2025 at 12:12 PM
Christianity is a hateful religion, just like all the other religions.
October 23, 2025 at 9:05 AM
Born that way.
October 22, 2025 at 3:17 PM
What do you think about this? Another instance of Letby falsifying records?
October 4, 2025 at 1:54 PM
The prosecution did not rely on the Lee paper. That is the fundamental misunderstanding that the narcissistic Lee can't accept.
October 2, 2025 at 5:31 PM
They were not.
October 2, 2025 at 12:18 PM
Read this, from July 2024, and ask yourself why Shoo Lee is persisting with his Quixotic campaign, and also who is funding Maltin PR and their entire circus?
October 2, 2025 at 7:20 AM
Oh dear.

Read para 187, and note the date of July last year.

www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u...
October 1, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Impressive...
October 1, 2025 at 7:10 PM
Pedophilia seems to be quite the theme, with the pic of DJT and support for the catholic church - possibly the largest organised pedo ring on Earth...
September 16, 2025 at 5:21 PM
Babies aren't affected by abortion.

Are you saying she deserved to be murdered?
September 16, 2025 at 5:13 PM
September 8, 2025 at 1:14 PM
Not the CoA:
September 7, 2025 at 7:23 PM
This is the end of para 187. It proves that Lee had misunderstood the prosecution's evidence.
September 7, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Statistical evidence wasn't used against Letby. She was convicted based on witness statements and the pattern of injuries seen in her victims.
September 7, 2025 at 5:06 PM
The CoA already saw that paper, and referred to it in their judgement at para 169.

So it isn't "new medical evidence" at all. Are you ignorant of the facts, or lying for Letby?
September 7, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Do you understand that Lee misunderstood the Prosecution's use of his paper, and so his criticisms are completely unfounded?

Maltin PR's dossier is already with the CCRC. They will of course dismiss it.
September 7, 2025 at 12:57 PM
"The doctors who's research was used to convict her said that the courts got it wrong"

Shoo Lee is wrong. See paragraph 187..

www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u...
September 4, 2025 at 9:36 AM