Oh, I definitely did? Where did I say it then? Oh yeah, nowhere.
All this is a distraction from you being spectacularly wrong and needing to move the goalposts because you're an emotionally immature little loser who can't think of a healthy way to get people to interact with them.
Gfy
All this is a distraction from you being spectacularly wrong and needing to move the goalposts because you're an emotionally immature little loser who can't think of a healthy way to get people to interact with them.
Gfy
November 22, 2025 at 3:41 AM
Oh, I definitely did? Where did I say it then? Oh yeah, nowhere.
All this is a distraction from you being spectacularly wrong and needing to move the goalposts because you're an emotionally immature little loser who can't think of a healthy way to get people to interact with them.
Gfy
All this is a distraction from you being spectacularly wrong and needing to move the goalposts because you're an emotionally immature little loser who can't think of a healthy way to get people to interact with them.
Gfy
It could have been fine, but the way she did it was terrible optics.
That's really beside the point. You asked for a picture of a Dem meeting with Trump in the Oval Office - you got one.
That's really beside the point. You asked for a picture of a Dem meeting with Trump in the Oval Office - you got one.
November 22, 2025 at 1:02 AM
It could have been fine, but the way she did it was terrible optics.
That's really beside the point. You asked for a picture of a Dem meeting with Trump in the Oval Office - you got one.
That's really beside the point. You asked for a picture of a Dem meeting with Trump in the Oval Office - you got one.
Nowhere did I say that. Maybe work on your reading comprehension.
November 22, 2025 at 12:59 AM
Nowhere did I say that. Maybe work on your reading comprehension.
We can keep going if you'd like
November 22, 2025 at 12:26 AM
We can keep going if you'd like
Moving the goalposts 🙄
November 22, 2025 at 12:23 AM
Moving the goalposts 🙄
I don't think you understand how politics work if that's what you think Mamdani was doing.
November 21, 2025 at 11:00 PM
I don't think you understand how politics work if that's what you think Mamdani was doing.
The entire meeting is performative, and Mamdani's optics were stellar
November 21, 2025 at 9:02 PM
The entire meeting is performative, and Mamdani's optics were stellar
Reposted by Nick Borriello
Use Rule IX for an impeachment vote. When it fails, do it again. And again. And again. Deny every unanimous consent. Appeal every point of order including ones you just made up. Make every vote be recorded. Be unruly and disorderly. Call Johnson a scumbag traitor on the floor, and then keep going.
November 20, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Use Rule IX for an impeachment vote. When it fails, do it again. And again. And again. Deny every unanimous consent. Appeal every point of order including ones you just made up. Make every vote be recorded. Be unruly and disorderly. Call Johnson a scumbag traitor on the floor, and then keep going.
You are a Zionist, of course you defend her
November 19, 2025 at 8:54 PM
You are a Zionist, of course you defend her
If your child is ever in a school shooting, I'll go harass them and then tell you that it's in the past and you aren't owed an apology.
November 18, 2025 at 11:51 PM
If your child is ever in a school shooting, I'll go harass them and then tell you that it's in the past and you aren't owed an apology.
You approve of how he's handled Israel-Gaza and the shutdown? He's earned his negative approval rating. Republicans like him because he's bad at his job.
November 18, 2025 at 11:37 PM
You approve of how he's handled Israel-Gaza and the shutdown? He's earned his negative approval rating. Republicans like him because he's bad at his job.
It is completely rational.
November 18, 2025 at 11:15 PM
It is completely rational.
Reposted by Nick Borriello
conceding to far right ideas about the structure of society is conceding to a zero sum vision of the world, and more importantly giving voters a choice between two zero sum visions, where one is half hearted and the other is full throated. is it really a surprise then they choose the latter?
November 18, 2025 at 2:44 PM
conceding to far right ideas about the structure of society is conceding to a zero sum vision of the world, and more importantly giving voters a choice between two zero sum visions, where one is half hearted and the other is full throated. is it really a surprise then they choose the latter?
Reposted by Nick Borriello
"Do the Democratic Party's flirtations with a social welfare state prevent them from having a tent big enough to include moderate Nazis? Read The New York Times Opinion to find out."
November 17, 2025 at 11:59 AM
"Do the Democratic Party's flirtations with a social welfare state prevent them from having a tent big enough to include moderate Nazis? Read The New York Times Opinion to find out."
"Have a good one" don't be such a sarcastic ass to people next time
November 18, 2025 at 9:50 PM
"Have a good one" don't be such a sarcastic ass to people next time
I bet several republicans fought tooth and nail behind the scenes to pass it via UC rather than a floor vote. Ask yourself why.
November 18, 2025 at 9:49 PM
I bet several republicans fought tooth and nail behind the scenes to pass it via UC rather than a floor vote. Ask yourself why.
No one objecting is them using the rules for cover. I get that it feels pedantic, but there is a substantive difference there.
November 18, 2025 at 9:45 PM
No one objecting is them using the rules for cover. I get that it feels pedantic, but there is a substantive difference there.
Unanimous consent doesn't necessarily mean it'd be unanimous if put to a floor vote
November 18, 2025 at 9:28 PM
Unanimous consent doesn't necessarily mean it'd be unanimous if put to a floor vote
Reposted by Nick Borriello
“things happen” when it’s someone that annoys them but when it’s charlie kirk it’s terrorism
November 18, 2025 at 6:02 PM
“things happen” when it’s someone that annoys them but when it’s charlie kirk it’s terrorism