Nick H
@nick-704.bsky.social
Love reading, movies, vinyl records, fishing, ATV’s, camping etc.
No, the WNBA does not currently make a profit. As of the most recent available reports, the league has historically operated at a loss and continues to do so, though it is on the cusp of potential profitability thanks to massive growth and a new media rights deal.
Lost 50mil last year.
Lost 50mil last year.
January 10, 2026 at 12:08 AM
No, the WNBA does not currently make a profit. As of the most recent available reports, the league has historically operated at a loss and continues to do so, though it is on the cusp of potential profitability thanks to massive growth and a new media rights deal.
Lost 50mil last year.
Lost 50mil last year.
It doesn’t matter if he approves of it. Murder(most likely 2nd degree) is a state charge, settled in a state court that a sitting US President cannot pardon. The political leaders at the state level in Minnesota are against trump, so why hasn’t he been arrested?
January 9, 2026 at 11:53 PM
It doesn’t matter if he approves of it. Murder(most likely 2nd degree) is a state charge, settled in a state court that a sitting US President cannot pardon. The political leaders at the state level in Minnesota are against trump, so why hasn’t he been arrested?
That’s what I said? Not to tighten your focus and keep momentum on the issue? In the future you’ll wonder why people ignore you. It’s this.
January 9, 2026 at 11:46 PM
That’s what I said? Not to tighten your focus and keep momentum on the issue? In the future you’ll wonder why people ignore you. It’s this.
I’ve heard that he shot her because she was gay, he has a small dick, he’s racist, he’s sexist, he wasn’t trained, he has PTSD, now all men are just evil. You can’t use this incident to fix everything that ails you, fix this problem first. Why isn’t he arrested?
January 9, 2026 at 11:30 PM
I’ve heard that he shot her because she was gay, he has a small dick, he’s racist, he’s sexist, he wasn’t trained, he has PTSD, now all men are just evil. You can’t use this incident to fix everything that ails you, fix this problem first. Why isn’t he arrested?
Murder isn’t tried at the federal level unless done on federal land or against a federal employee.
A murder conviction in this case would be done by the state. It doesn’t matter who investigates. It all gets turned over to the state’s attorney, and it’s up to them to prosecute. No pardon.
A murder conviction in this case would be done by the state. It doesn’t matter who investigates. It all gets turned over to the state’s attorney, and it’s up to them to prosecute. No pardon.
January 9, 2026 at 2:52 AM
Murder isn’t tried at the federal level unless done on federal land or against a federal employee.
A murder conviction in this case would be done by the state. It doesn’t matter who investigates. It all gets turned over to the state’s attorney, and it’s up to them to prosecute. No pardon.
A murder conviction in this case would be done by the state. It doesn’t matter who investigates. It all gets turned over to the state’s attorney, and it’s up to them to prosecute. No pardon.
Murder isn’t tried at the federal level unless done on federal land or against a federal employee.
A murder conviction in this case would be done by the state. It doesn’t matter who investigates. It all gets turned over to the state’s attorney, and it’s up to them to prosecute. No pardon.
A murder conviction in this case would be done by the state. It doesn’t matter who investigates. It all gets turned over to the state’s attorney, and it’s up to them to prosecute. No pardon.
January 9, 2026 at 2:51 AM
Murder isn’t tried at the federal level unless done on federal land or against a federal employee.
A murder conviction in this case would be done by the state. It doesn’t matter who investigates. It all gets turned over to the state’s attorney, and it’s up to them to prosecute. No pardon.
A murder conviction in this case would be done by the state. It doesn’t matter who investigates. It all gets turned over to the state’s attorney, and it’s up to them to prosecute. No pardon.
The state would be the arresting authority, so it’d have to stay in Minnesota.
January 9, 2026 at 2:46 AM
The state would be the arresting authority, so it’d have to stay in Minnesota.
I’d steer clear of pardon discussions. The autopen gave a lot of dishonest people ‘get out of jail, free,’ cards a couple years ago. I still don’t know what they were protecting themselves from, but I have a bad feeling.
January 9, 2026 at 2:45 AM
I’d steer clear of pardon discussions. The autopen gave a lot of dishonest people ‘get out of jail, free,’ cards a couple years ago. I still don’t know what they were protecting themselves from, but I have a bad feeling.
I’d rather have him arrested and in custody before he’s named. We’re a nation of laws and he has the right to a fair trial. We can’t have vigilantes, we need justice.
If someone else won’t follow the rules, be better. Show them how to win the right way.
If someone else won’t follow the rules, be better. Show them how to win the right way.
January 9, 2026 at 2:39 AM
I’d rather have him arrested and in custody before he’s named. We’re a nation of laws and he has the right to a fair trial. We can’t have vigilantes, we need justice.
If someone else won’t follow the rules, be better. Show them how to win the right way.
If someone else won’t follow the rules, be better. Show them how to win the right way.
Everyone needs to focus on the future. How do we make sure to beat JD Vance?
January 9, 2026 at 1:40 AM
Everyone needs to focus on the future. How do we make sure to beat JD Vance?
A federal agent loses (or is denied) qualified immunity if a court determines that:
1. The plaintiff plausibly proved a violation of a constitutional right.
2. That right was clearly established by existing precedent at the time of the incident.
We’ll find out in court.
1. The plaintiff plausibly proved a violation of a constitutional right.
2. That right was clearly established by existing precedent at the time of the incident.
We’ll find out in court.
January 9, 2026 at 1:12 AM
A federal agent loses (or is denied) qualified immunity if a court determines that:
1. The plaintiff plausibly proved a violation of a constitutional right.
2. That right was clearly established by existing precedent at the time of the incident.
We’ll find out in court.
1. The plaintiff plausibly proved a violation of a constitutional right.
2. That right was clearly established by existing precedent at the time of the incident.
We’ll find out in court.