nicholasroeg.bsky.social
@nicholasroeg.bsky.social
We need to elect people who will use their power to fight the abuses of power, whoever they may be
November 2, 2025 at 10:35 PM
I don't believe the best person to meet this moment is someone who simply excels at being another empty suit. Fox will flip out regardless, it's what they do
November 2, 2025 at 10:30 PM
A lot of the reason we are where we are is because Don's got no pushback from cowardly and feckless Dems so he goes further. Even the ones who have pushed back some like JB, who I mostly like, aren't out there in solidarity or to protect his citizens. There's no real plan or organized resistance
November 2, 2025 at 10:23 PM
That's your right, but don't expect anything to change
November 2, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Kat stayed in the battle, and keeps coming back to get tossed around some more. She has courage that is actually useful. The others are the weak scared ones who are just safely hiding.
November 2, 2025 at 10:11 PM
Kat is out there standing for something while the rest are hiding behind their walls, guards and security systems. She also signed off, but Tara was too busy not paying attention to notice, and then tried to make Kat look bad because she was embarrassed
November 2, 2025 at 10:05 PM
We need people who are actually out on the streets standing up for the citizens not talking a decent game but actually doing nothing like all these blowhards that act as if they are even more powerless than we are (they tell us to go get sprayed so we can document abuses they'll never legislate)
November 2, 2025 at 10:02 PM
I'd like to know what Tara's response to Kat saying she couldn't talk about it beforehand was. Surely it wasn't, don't worry, about a half hour in I might get around to actually asking something you can talk about...
November 2, 2025 at 7:59 PM
Tara's best decision would have been to not post this at all, but she seemingly prefers to keep getting massively ratio'd with her look at me nonsense then to learn from it and move on, and this is coming from someone who generally likes her work
November 2, 2025 at 7:56 PM
A more professional journalist would have both noticed that Kat signed off, and then not tried to frame the narrative to make it about themselves, especially while pushing the unbiased bs.
November 2, 2025 at 7:54 PM
Tara was acting in bad faith pounding the official story while showing no interest in what Kat stood for or why people are out their risking themselves. Next she'll have the priest on and just ask why he's making them waste ammunition on his head...
November 2, 2025 at 7:44 PM
Kat surely assumed a good faith intv where there were questions beyond what she told Tara she can't answer beforehand. She probably should have just answered the question she wanted at some point to shift things on her own rather than assuming Tara would actually take a hint.
November 2, 2025 at 7:42 PM
And calm ones who simply stick to what they stated they would pre interview...
October 31, 2025 at 11:34 PM
Where is the Tara who brings us the stories of "victims living in fear of retribution from powerful men"??? This interview should have been on brand...
October 31, 2025 at 11:11 PM
This was more of an audition for the DOJ or Newsmax than an interview. I learned nothing about Kat, but a lot about you given you insist on quadrupling down on it. You are better than just being someone who piles on the vulnerable, or at least I thought you were.
October 31, 2025 at 9:12 PM
I previously thought you were a champion for the vulnerable and a voice for the relatively voiceless
October 31, 2025 at 7:24 AM
This video was so "How can I say I don't support the victim without explicitly stating I don't support the victim"
October 31, 2025 at 2:45 AM
This "interview" is so misguided. Even if you think she's a criminal, the debate is over human rights, free speech, states rights, etc
October 31, 2025 at 2:12 AM
There's nothing to learn about Kat from this "interview" beyond Kat is smart enough to take the most basic legal advice.
October 31, 2025 at 1:53 AM
Asking questions implies you have more than 1 without rephrasing, and it's something she didn't already explain she obviously couldn't answer. Everyone can see through the nonpartisan claim here because you were only interested in making her look guilty.
October 31, 2025 at 1:43 AM
Amazing how Krystal Kyle and friends substack managed to do roughly a full hour interview with Kat where we actually learned about her and her candidacy without just trying to force her to go against common sense and lawyer advice and potentially get herself into more trouble.
October 31, 2025 at 1:24 AM
What happened to standing with the victims and believing the women? You clearly not only took a side here, but tried to get her to incriminate herself, and then whined when she was smart enough not to comply.
October 31, 2025 at 1:10 AM
The sides are the best part
August 10, 2025 at 10:22 PM