N H
@nhintx.bsky.social
But with health insurance it is more akin to getting the discount by promising to wire them in and then not doing it.
I have trouble believing the 40% number, but if true it reflects a huge failure on the part of the ACA: covering vaccines and routine tests was supposed to encourage their use
I have trouble believing the 40% number, but if true it reflects a huge failure on the part of the ACA: covering vaccines and routine tests was supposed to encourage their use
November 10, 2025 at 5:45 PM
But with health insurance it is more akin to getting the discount by promising to wire them in and then not doing it.
I have trouble believing the 40% number, but if true it reflects a huge failure on the part of the ACA: covering vaccines and routine tests was supposed to encourage their use
I have trouble believing the 40% number, but if true it reflects a huge failure on the part of the ACA: covering vaccines and routine tests was supposed to encourage their use
You are ignoring the fact that free preventative care is included with health insurance and the argument in favor of mandatory coverage was that preventative care would bring down the cost of healthcare. I've never seen fire insurance include free benefits.
November 10, 2025 at 4:53 PM
You are ignoring the fact that free preventative care is included with health insurance and the argument in favor of mandatory coverage was that preventative care would bring down the cost of healthcare. I've never seen fire insurance include free benefits.