Vadim Axelrod
neurovadim.bsky.social
Vadim Axelrod
@neurovadim.bsky.social
PI at Bar-Ilan University (Cognitive Neuroscience)
https://www.axelrodlab.org/
You can add to your list:
Anton syndrome:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOla...
Riddoch syndrome:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29753019/ (there is video in the paper)
split-brain demo:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=lfGw...
I also liked this one on lobotomy:
www.pbslearningmedia.org/resource/psy...
October 24, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Congrats for opening the lab!
October 2, 2025 at 7:38 PM
Happy Birthday to you !
September 29, 2025 at 7:19 PM
But people with spatial neglect do have problems imagining in a specific visual field (e.g., an experiment with Piazza del Duomo, Bisiach and Luzzatti, 1978).
September 17, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Also, if the replication is done in non-English-speaking countries, not all languages may have equivalent terms for “smashed,” “hit,” or “bumped...
September 9, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Can you give an example of a bug the LLM found? Did you have to first explain what the code was intended to do?
August 29, 2025 at 7:37 PM
I am so sorry for your loss, Anil. You wrote so warmly about your mother in your book.
August 22, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Thanks. Yeah… for now, LLMs are undoubtedly limited. I’d say it’s not about thinking for you. In some cases where I benefited, it was about getting hints (e.g., a direction of thought I hadn’t considered before). Just one more way to challenge yourself.
August 19, 2025 at 11:18 AM
Asking an LLM to critique your research ideas or to search for confounds in the planned experiment, might also occasionally be helpful.
August 18, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Indeed, Figs. 1 and 2 are insightful. We are using social animations, and it was illuminating to learn the extent the activation patterns vary across the paradigms.
August 17, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Maybe this playlist I encountered would be useful for you:
www.youtube.com/playlist?lis...
Psychology - YouTube
www.youtube.com
August 16, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Thank you! @college-de-france.fr archive, permitting to watch your lectures recorded 15 years ago, is truly outstanding.
August 4, 2025 at 7:31 PM
Dear Stan, if you record it (and upload afterwards), it could be awesome for people around the globe...
July 23, 2025 at 7:37 PM
I'm very sorry to hear that, Jonathan. Wishing you a speedy and full recovery!
July 19, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Congrats, well deserved!
July 1, 2025 at 7:18 PM
Completely burned-down labs...
June 15, 2025 at 7:32 PM
That’s a good question...
Those individuals have probably completed the VVIQ more than once in their lives. However, if the test-retest reliability of the VVIQ is good, then it’s probably not a major issue.
June 14, 2025 at 2:11 PM
When they decrease the font size, it seems as though the people who design this stuff are too young to take into account that vision deteriorates with age — and many researchers aren’t that young...
June 14, 2025 at 2:02 PM
From our perspective, it's obviously great that there are people willing to participate for free.. I’ve run some experiments on MTurk, where money is the only incentive. So, at Aphantasia Network has access to a large sample size, though the participants there are not entirely naïve.
June 14, 2025 at 1:47 PM
There were 35,467 participants from aphantasia.com. The authors do not mention whether the participants were paid, so does this mean that people on the site are willing to take part in experiments just for fun...
Aphantasia Network · Image Free Thinking
A place to discover and learn about aphantasia
aphantasia.com
June 14, 2025 at 1:14 PM
In Israel, April-September there is not single day without sun...
June 11, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Congrats!
June 4, 2025 at 7:55 PM
It may also learn from your own requests. I now asked it to give me references on one of research themes I interacted with it previously. The refs and biblio details were correct. When I did the same request from account which had not made cognitive requests previously, the references were wrong.
May 29, 2025 at 10:55 AM
Once they solve hallucinations with references, it will be difficult (or even impossible) to know whether the scientific writing was generated by a human or not. So, the way it works now offer some advantages 😀
May 28, 2025 at 10:46 AM
First reference by Addis, Schacter et al., from 2019 also does not seem to exist. Donna Addis & Daniel Schacter pursued this line of research about a decade earlier...
May 27, 2025 at 7:29 PM