Autistic Investigator 🕵️‍♀️
banner
neurofucked.bsky.social
Autistic Investigator 🕵️‍♀️
@neurofucked.bsky.social
🌊🌊🌊 #Kamala2028
Reposted by Autistic Investigator 🕵️‍♀️
You think Hillary Clinton would’ve selected Supreme Court Justices that destroyed Roe v Wade? No

Then shut the fuck up and learn something
November 18, 2025 at 7:35 PM
preventing disruption.”

First am rights are not absolute.
November 18, 2025 at 8:16 PM
“If the comments disrupt your employer's interest in an efficient workplace, the speech may not enjoy First Amendment protections.”

“For a post made as a private individual about current events, your interest in exercising your right to free speech is weighed against your employer's interest in
November 18, 2025 at 8:15 PM
IDGAF about Charlie Kirk getting shot, but if I was a lawyer at a university, I certainly wouldn’t say “he deserved it” on a public social media page

Republicans/racists work at all levels of government, so saying “he’s racist, he deserved it” would likely impair workplace relations / disrupt
November 18, 2025 at 8:13 PM
if I was in trouble for shit posting on social media, I’d stop posting (under my real name) during the investigation

Government employees, social media and the first amendment

canons.sog.unc.edu/2025/09/gove...
Government Employees, Social Media, and the First Amendment (again) - Coates’ Canons NC Local Government Law
Since the rise of social media, every national political event produces multiple examples of government employees being disciplined for on-line comments about that event. The shooting of Charlie Kirk ...
canons.sog.unc.edu
November 18, 2025 at 7:27 PM
He should put his account on private until his legal matters are resolved, what an idiot
November 15, 2025 at 2:37 PM
That kind of harassment wouldn’t be so shocking for a 20 yr old college student, but for a 40 yr old lawyer to say that, publicly, it indicates an extreme lack of maturity and discretion
November 14, 2025 at 2:00 PM
#JohnathanPerkins #UCLA should have known better than to post crap on social media which can harm his employers reputation

The misogynistic posts about harassing women while shopping would be enough for me to fire him

Deleting your twitter account won’t help your case either
November 14, 2025 at 1:58 PM
Employers can take action against employees for social media posts that… cause significant reputational harm to the employer.
November 14, 2025 at 1:37 PM
November 14, 2025 at 1:35 PM
November 14, 2025 at 1:33 PM
Your employer is preparing for litigation against you, so of course they’re looking at your social media posts

This guy is really #neurofucked if he thinks his public social media posts can’t be reviewed by his employer
November 14, 2025 at 1:12 PM
an excuse either

If you don’t want your employer to use your social media posts against you to terminate your stupid ass, don’t use your real name on social media

#TheMoreYouKnow
November 14, 2025 at 1:00 PM