arxiv.org/html/2412.07...

According to this, at CVPR 2023, 1% of Authors account for 50% of the papers… is it really skewed this much?

Interesting experience. Done with experiments and ask an LLM to look for any data leakage (surprised by results). LLM suggests to add some checks and balances so I defer to its grand intelligence and allow some code to be added. 1/2

In case you’re wondering where many of the globally important AI conferences in 2025 are being held, here’s a quick reference:

🇺🇸 NeurIPS ‘25
🇺🇸 CVPR ‘25
🇺🇸 ICCV ‘25
🇺🇸 ICRA ‘25
🇺🇸 AAAI ‘25
🇺🇸 NAACL ‘25
🇺🇸 WACV ‘25
🇸🇬 ICLR ‘25
🇨🇦 IJCAI ‘25
🇦🇹 ACL ‘25
🇨🇳 EMNLP ‘25
🇹🇭 AISTATS ‘25

Is aideadlin.es no longer updated? Does someone have an alternative I can bookmark?

This post is in response to some of the discussion I’ve seen around recent ICLR reviews. I wish I had an archive of my emails from previous institutions to have all details. About 15 years ago I had NeurIPS reviews with scores 10, 5, and 1. Regarding 10 and 1, assigning these scores… (1/2)

It feels like computer vision is evolving in a direction where more and more of the most central advances rely on advanced mathematics. Is this my imagination, or do others feel this as well?

Hello Bluesky!

Bluesky user counter web site:
(In case you’re interested in growth rate)

bcounter.nat.vg

In the case of transformers (and especially ViT), it seems like interesting possibilities abound in getting creative with different choices for Q, K and V. Flamingo is one nice example of this. Any suggestions on innovative works that do something outside typical “vanilla” configurations?