Need inspiration? We're happy to provide prompts or help you develop your ideas. You can even send us a sample to ensure your piece aligns with our vision.

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁: thejournal@neurodiversityinlaw.co.uk

𝗪𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁: 600-1200 for reviews, 800-2000 for articles.

What makes our publication unique? We're looking for engaging, conversational content that informs without overwhelming. Think New York Times style – accessible yet insightful. Got an original take on a familiar topic? We'd love to hear it.

𝗞𝗲𝘆 𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁:
• Legal practice developments
• Education policy and discrimination law
• Intersectionality and cultural perspectives
• Analysis of relevant case law
• Evidence-based practice recommendations
• Scientific insights into neurodiversity
• Book reviews and legal commentary

If you would like to contribute to The Journal—be it financially or by writing an article for us—please email thejournal@neurodiversityinlaw.co.uk.

Congratulations, Colinette and Maddy. We can't wait to see your work in the first edition of The Journal, which we hope to publish by the end of this year.

Question 2's winner was: Maddy Nicholl

The Judges considered Maddy's essay on the accessibility of the Criminal Bar for neurodivergent practitioners to be “punchy and persuasive” and “a compelling summary of the current barriers facing neurodivergent practitioners.”

and as a “compelling summary of the legislative framework in place at present, including introducing the Communications Act in an accessible way to the reader.”