Nathaniel Caiden
ncbarrister.bsky.social
Nathaniel Caiden
@ncbarrister.bsky.social
Barrister at Cloisters specialising in employment, discrimination, and equality.
Since 2020 I have had one of these www.amazon.co.uk/TP-Link-TL-S... - I know you said 5 ports but it is always useful to have a few extra. Never had any issues and it is even in a cupboard, just plug and play.
TP-Link TL-SG108S, 8 Port Gigabit Ethernet Network Switch, Ethernet Splitter, Hub, Desktop and Wall-Mounting, Sturdy Metal, Fanless, Plug and Play, Energy-Saving : Amazon.co.uk: Computers & Accessorie...
Buy
www.amazon.co.uk
August 1, 2025 at 8:34 AM
So my recollection is the quoted bit in Linsley was accepted as being just a correct statement of principle that the EAT in Hilaire were happy to attribute to Linsley, building upon Smith and fact that something is objective.
January 27, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Ok this is not a direct answer but in Hilaire v Luton BC [2023] IRLR 122 at [12] it decoupled the objective point (Smith) from the point that the result of this is that employer not required to select best but just needs to be reasonable (effectively the Linsley point).
January 27, 2025 at 6:27 PM