I haven't read this yet, but there might be some relevant stuff on "oh" in here:

academic.oup.com/book/45560

Thank you Farah, it was great working with you on this!

Yes, I think there have been more and more good subdiscipline open access journals. They are all worth taking seriously!!

A partial list:
liao.shen-yi.org/openaccess/

I've also tried to, individually, submit more to these journals.

Yeah I think "epistemic backchannel" is hers, but "backchannel" is from linguistics/conversational analysis

There's also this forthcoming paper: philpapers.org/rec/NAGCKA

But I thought you were identifying a way that "oh" used by the speaker may differ from the audience use of "oh" to signal novelty in the backchannel.

A lot of work to be done around here! I’ve been trying to write a little section of this big thing I’m working on on the various roles of the discourse marker “you know”

Oh, do you know Jennifer Nagel's work on the role of "oh" in the "epistemic backchannel"? (I know you're talking about a speaker use of the term, but it might be a place to start)

This is the best thing on bluesky, thank you for posting these slices of California

Max de Gaynesford has a book on poetry (philpapers.org/rec/DEGTRI-2)

Great to see that this is out!

I tried to comment on the serious part not the joke part but it’s late where I am

I could be wrong, but I think the finding is more about cultural variation in responses to Gödel-"style" cases than about Gödel himself, since the replication finds cultural differences also with the "super dog race" example from li et al (2018) designed to be useable with kid participants

At Chicago we had epistemic metaphysics

Great shots!