J. Nathan Matias 🦣
@natematias.social.coop.ap.brid.gy
Social & computer scientist who works alongside communities on science for a safer, fairer, more understanding Internet.
Founder, Citizens and Technology Lab · […]
[bridged from https://social.coop/@natematias on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]
Founder, Citizens and Technology Lab · […]
[bridged from https://social.coop/@natematias on the fediverse by https://fed.brid.gy/ ]
@grimalkina tell me it’s going to be okay and that we’re not all just teetering on the ice of overoptimism about what we can measure?
November 29, 2025 at 6:34 PM
@grimalkina tell me it’s going to be okay and that we’re not all just teetering on the ice of overoptimism about what we can measure?
In 2023, scientists estimate that 5.4k acute deaths and over 64k chronic deaths in North America were caused by wildfire smoke. Millions now face a question I ask every day: when is it safe to go outside?
AI forecasts might help, but is it safe to use them? […]
[Original post on social.coop]
AI forecasts might help, but is it safe to use them? […]
[Original post on social.coop]
November 25, 2025 at 1:24 AM
In 2023, scientists estimate that 5.4k acute deaths and over 64k chronic deaths in North America were caused by wildfire smoke. Millions now face a question I ask every day: when is it safe to go outside?
AI forecasts might help, but is it safe to use them? […]
[Original post on social.coop]
AI forecasts might help, but is it safe to use them? […]
[Original post on social.coop]
How dumb does a person need to think people are in order to send journalists public evidence that they are lying?
I guess that's what we can expect from someone on a team that scammed the postal service for tens of millions of dollars.
https://www.espn.com/olympics/cycling/news/story?id=6019436
I guess that's what we can expect from someone on a team that scammed the postal service for tens of millions of dollars.
https://www.espn.com/olympics/cycling/news/story?id=6019436
Documents reveal USPS spending on Armstrong
As a grand jury investigates Lance Armstrong The File digs up previously undisclosed details about the U.S. Postal Service's sponsorship of his cycling team.
www.espn.com
November 20, 2025 at 11:27 PM
How dumb does a person need to think people are in order to send journalists public evidence that they are lying?
I guess that's what we can expect from someone on a team that scammed the postal service for tens of millions of dollars.
https://www.espn.com/olympics/cycling/news/story?id=6019436
I guess that's what we can expect from someone on a team that scammed the postal service for tens of millions of dollars.
https://www.espn.com/olympics/cycling/news/story?id=6019436
This guy told Velo News that Lance Armstrong, who was banned from professional cycling, had nothing to do with this new team.
Then Velo News noticed that Lance Armstrong was a sponsor of the team, and that his logo was on the official jersey.
Not a great start for someone claiming that honesty […]
Then Velo News noticed that Lance Armstrong was a sponsor of the team, and that his logo was on the official jersey.
Not a great start for someone claiming that honesty […]
Original post on social.coop
social.coop
November 20, 2025 at 11:24 PM
This guy told Velo News that Lance Armstrong, who was banned from professional cycling, had nothing to do with this new team.
Then Velo News noticed that Lance Armstrong was a sponsor of the team, and that his logo was on the official jersey.
Not a great start for someone claiming that honesty […]
Then Velo News noticed that Lance Armstrong was a sponsor of the team, and that his logo was on the official jersey.
Not a great start for someone claiming that honesty […]
Reposted by J. Nathan Matias 🦣
Our new article in PNAS summarizes:
- Why is AI so hard to evaluate?
- Models of participatory science
- Five problems with participatory science
- Five areas where participatory methods can improve the science of AI
We hope this article helps researchers, communities, funders, organizers, and […]
- Why is AI so hard to evaluate?
- Models of participatory science
- Five problems with participatory science
- Five areas where participatory methods can improve the science of AI
We hope this article helps researchers, communities, funders, organizers, and […]
Original post on social.coop
social.coop
November 17, 2025 at 12:38 PM
Our new article in PNAS summarizes:
- Why is AI so hard to evaluate?
- Models of participatory science
- Five problems with participatory science
- Five areas where participatory methods can improve the science of AI
We hope this article helps researchers, communities, funders, organizers, and […]
- Why is AI so hard to evaluate?
- Models of participatory science
- Five problems with participatory science
- Five areas where participatory methods can improve the science of AI
We hope this article helps researchers, communities, funders, organizers, and […]
If you're an organizer, technologist, or scientist (of any kind) interested in participatory science about AI, I am hoping to continue a conversation we've already been having across @transparenttech and am considering a virtual meet-up in January.
Sign up here to express interest […]
Sign up here to express interest […]
Original post on social.coop
social.coop
November 17, 2025 at 1:08 PM
If you're an organizer, technologist, or scientist (of any kind) interested in participatory science about AI, I am hoping to continue a conversation we've already been having across @transparenttech and am considering a virtual meet-up in January.
Sign up here to express interest […]
Sign up here to express interest […]
In September when @pluralistic spoke with my class, we asked him what he would suggest students do for a better technology industry after joining the workforce.
His answer? Join a union, because collective organizing is the bedrock of change.
Our article in PNAS picks up from there by asking […]
His answer? Join a union, because collective organizing is the bedrock of change.
Our article in PNAS picks up from there by asking […]
Original post on social.coop
social.coop
November 17, 2025 at 12:41 PM
In September when @pluralistic spoke with my class, we asked him what he would suggest students do for a better technology industry after joining the workforce.
His answer? Join a union, because collective organizing is the bedrock of change.
Our article in PNAS picks up from there by asking […]
His answer? Join a union, because collective organizing is the bedrock of change.
Our article in PNAS picks up from there by asking […]
Our new article in PNAS summarizes:
- Why is AI so hard to evaluate?
- Models of participatory science
- Five problems with participatory science
- Five areas where participatory methods can improve the science of AI
We hope this article helps researchers, communities, funders, organizers, and […]
- Why is AI so hard to evaluate?
- Models of participatory science
- Five problems with participatory science
- Five areas where participatory methods can improve the science of AI
We hope this article helps researchers, communities, funders, organizers, and […]
Original post on social.coop
social.coop
November 17, 2025 at 12:38 PM
Our new article in PNAS summarizes:
- Why is AI so hard to evaluate?
- Models of participatory science
- Five problems with participatory science
- Five areas where participatory methods can improve the science of AI
We hope this article helps researchers, communities, funders, organizers, and […]
- Why is AI so hard to evaluate?
- Models of participatory science
- Five problems with participatory science
- Five areas where participatory methods can improve the science of AI
We hope this article helps researchers, communities, funders, organizers, and […]