There’s much more work in the pipeline with our working group, so please consider joining, if you’d like to contribute on how AI companies CAN and CANNOT use IP, based on these licenses.

So by introducing AI100 we begin the set of licenses that put human constraints on the applied use of such IP.

Next: with other licenses it’s easy to use them in the ways original Licensor maybe didn’t mean to (i.e. CC licenses were created for people to give back to others, not to make more profit for AI companies).

So by giving the choice between AI0 and AI100 you can be very explicit. The “fair use” case would not be predicated with your local jurisdiction explanation, but rather with the intent the Licensor has, which is giving their IP to humans.

You are right. But now imagine those companies comes and say that you “probably” meant for them to use it too, after all, they employ people, aren’t they?

Re: scraping – it’s a license. Not a firewall to prevent the scraping or monetize it (like CloudFlare does it, for example).

Again, if you’d love to contribute your expertise, please consider adding your contact details!

Our goal is to put humans first, and allow for distribution and derivatives for humans’ benefit, not AI’s or companies behind the AI. Including the scraping you have mentioned.

Yes, I’m with you. Especially on the part where lots of AI companies don’t honor the licenses (any).

But our main objective here is to empower humans. Same as Creative Commons and Open Source foundations when they began their path decades ago.

Based on that, your legal representation may choose to take further action against such violation of the license.

It’s the first release, and we are happy to collaborate with lawyers in different jurisdictions!

Please consider filling the join form on the website!

So if you publish your work under AI0 and your work later was used by AI, it immediately violates the license agreement and voids such use, making the use of your work by AI illegal.

Great question Nia. As the guarantees go, it gives you power as the human to designate the use of the IP you created to other humans only. And it should be enforceable with the jurisdictions of the major countries.

This is our very first release, and we are eager to receive feedback to ensure that humans always remain the main priority.

It took decades for organizations like Creative Commons and the Linux Foundation to transform the world of open-source licenses. We aim to do it faster — with your help!

the risks for cognitive development + social changes are real, and not enough is done by the governments to actively investigate those and be more proactive about those.

just using “Study Mode” will not be a magic solution. What I think would happen at the very least, is that we will end up having a lot of “AI-ready customers”, who literally got exposed to the agents for X years of their life, when their brains have been in active development stage. 2/n

Hard to say without getting into a lot of speculation: we do need more data. It would heavily depend on the type of agents, instructions, the roles, the format of the rest of the school process (will teachers still be there? What is the % of their involvement? Would tower students be around?) 1/n

Check full article here: time.com/7295195/ai-c...