Natalie Caña
@nataliecana.bsky.social
🇵🇷🇩🇴Author of saucy stories with shenanigans and sabor
Go ahead and put the heavy mirror down, but I’d suggest looking in it first because the bad faith takes didn’t come from me or her.
✌🏽
✌🏽
July 8, 2025 at 3:57 AM
Go ahead and put the heavy mirror down, but I’d suggest looking in it first because the bad faith takes didn’t come from me or her.
✌🏽
✌🏽
The way I would tattoo “NYT Bestseller” somewhere where everyone could see it…like my forehead. 😂
July 8, 2025 at 2:26 AM
The way I would tattoo “NYT Bestseller” somewhere where everyone could see it…like my forehead. 😂
If anyone here is demonstrating arrogance, it’s you for thinking that your opinion on how anyone else should express themselves on their own account somehow supersedes their own.
July 7, 2025 at 11:21 PM
If anyone here is demonstrating arrogance, it’s you for thinking that your opinion on how anyone else should express themselves on their own account somehow supersedes their own.
The fact is that you decided that the way she celebrates her success is not to your personal liking, so you came into her replies to let her know your opinion, when she didn’t respond the way you wanted you tried to unsuccessfully change tactics and cry wolf.
July 7, 2025 at 11:21 PM
The fact is that you decided that the way she celebrates her success is not to your personal liking, so you came into her replies to let her know your opinion, when she didn’t respond the way you wanted you tried to unsuccessfully change tactics and cry wolf.
1) I’m not your “dude”
2) You didn’t bluntly state anything. Everything you wrote is buried under sarcasm and condescension dressed up as polite helpfulness.
3) There is no olive branch to be found in your response. You doubled down while also trying to make yourself out to be the wronged party.
2) You didn’t bluntly state anything. Everything you wrote is buried under sarcasm and condescension dressed up as polite helpfulness.
3) There is no olive branch to be found in your response. You doubled down while also trying to make yourself out to be the wronged party.
July 7, 2025 at 11:21 PM
1) I’m not your “dude”
2) You didn’t bluntly state anything. Everything you wrote is buried under sarcasm and condescension dressed up as polite helpfulness.
3) There is no olive branch to be found in your response. You doubled down while also trying to make yourself out to be the wronged party.
2) You didn’t bluntly state anything. Everything you wrote is buried under sarcasm and condescension dressed up as polite helpfulness.
3) There is no olive branch to be found in your response. You doubled down while also trying to make yourself out to be the wronged party.
To come back and try to reframe it as you doing some sort of friendly service by warning her about “humility” before someone more powerful does is condescending.
People really need to stop trying to make other people crush themselves into boxes to make themselves feel more comfortable.
People really need to stop trying to make other people crush themselves into boxes to make themselves feel more comfortable.
July 7, 2025 at 9:28 PM
To come back and try to reframe it as you doing some sort of friendly service by warning her about “humility” before someone more powerful does is condescending.
People really need to stop trying to make other people crush themselves into boxes to make themselves feel more comfortable.
People really need to stop trying to make other people crush themselves into boxes to make themselves feel more comfortable.
No. You said “rub salt in the wound harder” meaning her speaking on her success and happiness was the salt and someone else was the one with the wound.
It’s not on her to care for or cure anyone else’s wound. That’s a personal problem for the individual to handle.
It’s not on her to care for or cure anyone else’s wound. That’s a personal problem for the individual to handle.
July 7, 2025 at 9:28 PM
No. You said “rub salt in the wound harder” meaning her speaking on her success and happiness was the salt and someone else was the one with the wound.
It’s not on her to care for or cure anyone else’s wound. That’s a personal problem for the individual to handle.
It’s not on her to care for or cure anyone else’s wound. That’s a personal problem for the individual to handle.
They say content like we don’t know they are looking at what the characters on the cover look like, what their names are, what our names are, if all the words are in English, etc.
February 20, 2025 at 2:25 AM
They say content like we don’t know they are looking at what the characters on the cover look like, what their names are, what our names are, if all the words are in English, etc.
My point is, readers who say this are full of shit. They 100% read based on race. They just act like their choices are based on “content”
February 20, 2025 at 2:14 AM
My point is, readers who say this are full of shit. They 100% read based on race. They just act like their choices are based on “content”
She said to my face, “I don’t usually read stories like that because I can’t relate to the characters.”
I asked her what she wrote and she said paranormal. To which I replied, “So you can relate to vampires, werewolves, and fallen angels but not Latinos. Interesting.”
I asked her what she wrote and she said paranormal. To which I replied, “So you can relate to vampires, werewolves, and fallen angels but not Latinos. Interesting.”
February 20, 2025 at 2:14 AM
She said to my face, “I don’t usually read stories like that because I can’t relate to the characters.”
I asked her what she wrote and she said paranormal. To which I replied, “So you can relate to vampires, werewolves, and fallen angels but not Latinos. Interesting.”
I asked her what she wrote and she said paranormal. To which I replied, “So you can relate to vampires, werewolves, and fallen angels but not Latinos. Interesting.”
This was done because (racism duh) but also he saw the intelligence & power Black people provided in the revolutions taking part all over Latin America. He was a scared little bitch ass…sound familiar? 2/2
February 19, 2025 at 7:00 PM
This was done because (racism duh) but also he saw the intelligence & power Black people provided in the revolutions taking part all over Latin America. He was a scared little bitch ass…sound familiar? 2/2
In 1848 the Governor of Puerto Rico passed the Bando contra la Raza Negra, a proclamation that targeted Black people (freed & enslaved) & “legally” allowed the harshest punishments for any infraction against white people & affirmed white superiority. 1/2
February 19, 2025 at 7:00 PM
In 1848 the Governor of Puerto Rico passed the Bando contra la Raza Negra, a proclamation that targeted Black people (freed & enslaved) & “legally” allowed the harshest punishments for any infraction against white people & affirmed white superiority. 1/2
The story that the indigenous people of Puerto Rico offered the Spaniards a non-violent welcome because they believed they were gods is a myth. They knew about these violent strangers since their arrival at the neighboring island of Ayití 16 yrs earlier. Their “welcome” was political strategy.
February 15, 2025 at 8:48 PM
The story that the indigenous people of Puerto Rico offered the Spaniards a non-violent welcome because they believed they were gods is a myth. They knew about these violent strangers since their arrival at the neighboring island of Ayití 16 yrs earlier. Their “welcome” was political strategy.