@nannygoat57.bsky.social
Reposted
it’s only cloture if it comes from the Clôture region, otherwise it’s just sparkling capitulation
March 13, 2025 at 10:44 PM
it’s only cloture if it comes from the Clôture region, otherwise it’s just sparkling capitulation
Reposted
Never forget that the @nytimes.com @washingtonpost.com @newyorker.com @theatlantic.com and the rest of the national media spent the better part of last Spring bombarding us with reports that Joe Biden was the senile one
Trump: "I invaded Los Angeles and we opened up the water and the water is now flowing down. They have so much water they don't know what to do ... we broke in to do it."
March 13, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Never forget that the @nytimes.com @washingtonpost.com @newyorker.com @theatlantic.com and the rest of the national media spent the better part of last Spring bombarding us with reports that Joe Biden was the senile one
Reposted
CHUCK SCHUMER HAS TO GO. He’s way past his best by date and I’m not talking about age, I’m talking about usefulness.
Senate Dems need to step up and have some courage.
Senate Dems need to step up and have some courage.
March 13, 2025 at 10:08 PM
CHUCK SCHUMER HAS TO GO. He’s way past his best by date and I’m not talking about age, I’m talking about usefulness.
Senate Dems need to step up and have some courage.
Senate Dems need to step up and have some courage.
Reposted
Dante described a special place in hell for NYT headline writers, where they experience burning pain but there are no devils, no agents of torment, just weird ‘undercurrents’ like bad smells. Who is torturing them? No one in particular
February 3, 2025 at 8:29 PM
Dante described a special place in hell for NYT headline writers, where they experience burning pain but there are no devils, no agents of torment, just weird ‘undercurrents’ like bad smells. Who is torturing them? No one in particular
Reposted
This NYT sleight-of-hand is part of why Trump’s insane racism flourishes. The implication is that it’s possible to “attack diversity” WITHOUT a “racist undercurrent.”
And it “surfaces” - as though Trump hasn’t been a rabid and explicit racist for years, and this is some new tone.
And it “surfaces” - as though Trump hasn’t been a rabid and explicit racist for years, and this is some new tone.
February 3, 2025 at 8:19 PM
This NYT sleight-of-hand is part of why Trump’s insane racism flourishes. The implication is that it’s possible to “attack diversity” WITHOUT a “racist undercurrent.”
And it “surfaces” - as though Trump hasn’t been a rabid and explicit racist for years, and this is some new tone.
And it “surfaces” - as though Trump hasn’t been a rabid and explicit racist for years, and this is some new tone.