Reposted by Nancy Řiháková
I'm not splitting hairs about definitions here, or trying to be a killjoy. It's important to get this right, because conservation is not just a matter of aesthetics.
It's possible to share breakthroughs in gene editing technology without misrepresenting the science just to raise venture capital.
It's possible to share breakthroughs in gene editing technology without misrepresenting the science just to raise venture capital.
April 7, 2025 at 3:44 PM
I'm not splitting hairs about definitions here, or trying to be a killjoy. It's important to get this right, because conservation is not just a matter of aesthetics.
It's possible to share breakthroughs in gene editing technology without misrepresenting the science just to raise venture capital.
It's possible to share breakthroughs in gene editing technology without misrepresenting the science just to raise venture capital.
Except BE a Canadian.
March 2, 2025 at 4:25 AM
Except BE a Canadian.