@nancyjhudson.bsky.social
This means that there are very likely still outstanding payments the government will still be making to those contractors so actual savings are totally unknown. I know a lot of them there was no savings as is but the ones they're still claiming savings on there could be zero savings on those as well
February 26, 2025 at 2:12 AM
This means that there are very likely still outstanding payments the government will still be making to those contractors so actual savings are totally unknown. I know a lot of them there was no savings as is but the ones they're still claiming savings on there could be zero savings on those as well
I work in government contracting though I'm not a contracting officer. All the reporting misses extremely important points regarding terminations for convenience by the government of contracts. Contractors have their right to file claims for costs that they have incurred. And trust me they will
February 26, 2025 at 2:11 AM
I work in government contracting though I'm not a contracting officer. All the reporting misses extremely important points regarding terminations for convenience by the government of contracts. Contractors have their right to file claims for costs that they have incurred. And trust me they will
Reposted
Part of the chaos of this moment comes from a press failing to call illegal what's illegal, to identify when these are powers not granted to the feds. And part from people cooperating with illegal orders.
I want to make it clear that no executive order can change federal law and every executive order trump has signed has expressly disclaimed the intent to. The screenshot is from the DEI EO. That’s before you get to courts actually blocking big parts of it. And yet the overcompliance is legion.
February 25, 2025 at 4:50 PM
Part of the chaos of this moment comes from a press failing to call illegal what's illegal, to identify when these are powers not granted to the feds. And part from people cooperating with illegal orders.