Our package aims at being exhaustive. If your implementation is missing, checkout our GitHub to add your similarity measures!

GitHub: github.com/nacloos/simi...
Paper: openreview.net/forum?id=vyR...

Work with Robert Yang and Chris Cueva. (6/6)

Naming conventions with too few names led to consistency errors when comparing CKA implementations across papers.

We iteratively refined our naming convention to resolve inconsistencies while keeping low naming complexity. (5/6)

For example, we applied our procedure to derive a standardized naming convention unifying CKA measures. (4/6)

Standardization is challenging because the field keeps evolving. The ideal naming convention shouldn't be static but should flexibly evolve too!

We propose a package and a procedure as a step towards this goal. (3/6)

The number of similarity measures keeps growing and comparisons across studies become more and more challenging, mainly due to differences in naming and implementation conventions. (2/6)