24. You can binge and become an ultra runner.

Everyone needs to be very clear where they stand on Charlie Kirk's murder, a horrifying and unforgivable act, when they are debating the question of whether he ought to be lionized or not.

These two things are being conflated by those on the right who would like to paint everyone who didn't happen to like Charlie Kirk as being complicit in his death.

However, a lot of people are, I believe, participating in the debate over whether Charlie Kirk ought to be lionized, and their arguments that he shouldn't be are being interpreted as arguments that he somehow therefore deserved to be killed.

Anyone who believes this, you are essentially arguing in support of a descent into violence, and I strongly recommend that you think harder about your views and their implications.

and whether he deserves to be lionized and held up as a hero. I haven't met anyone who thinks that because they found Charlie Kirk's views to be terrible he therefore deserved to have done to him the horrible thing that was done to him.

Nice choice, it turned out well.

How did you all know this was AI (and was it?)?

What attitude exactly?

I call BS. WHat would be bad for Trump would be an image of DHS attacking people engaging in non-violent resistance. This image is exactly what he needs to convince moderates that using the national guard is justified.

Non-violently.

Why? I simply don't get it. This looks like disorder, which plays into Trump's supporters fears.

Can someone explain to me how DHS's post doesn't help Trump? If there is some cue that it's fake, most people aren't going to see it.

Perspective matters 🫶

I don't understand?