Michael Whitehorn
@mwhitehorn.bsky.social
Wilson (DC), Elmira College, DU Law, Obama, Udall, Hancock, DeGette, DSCF, Crow, Griswold alum. Current MAC Group. All thoughts are my own!
https://www.macgroupconsulting.com/
I like politics, food, and being inside. Oh, outer space and democracy too!
https://www.macgroupconsulting.com/
I like politics, food, and being inside. Oh, outer space and democracy too!
I'm not an attorney!
December 21, 2024 at 12:00 AM
I'm not an attorney!
Everyone already knew you weren't an attorney! :)
December 20, 2024 at 11:57 PM
Everyone already knew you weren't an attorney! :)
I don't understand what you are talking about. What other laws should she have been charged with breaking? The law linked is the law on topic.
December 20, 2024 at 11:53 PM
I don't understand what you are talking about. What other laws should she have been charged with breaking? The law linked is the law on topic.
i dont know what this is, but the specific law in question here is copied below. it requires a "knowing" mental state.
Section 1-13-708 - Tampering with voting equipment, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1-13-708 | Casetext Search + Citator
Read Section 1-13-708 - Tampering with voting equipment, Colo. Rev. Stat. § 1-13-708, see flags on bad law, and search Casetext’s comprehensive legal database
casetext.com
December 20, 2024 at 11:29 PM
i dont know what this is, but the specific law in question here is copied below. it requires a "knowing" mental state.
The law requires intention. Is it your contention that the SOS herself intentionally posted these passwords on the site?
December 20, 2024 at 11:17 PM
The law requires intention. Is it your contention that the SOS herself intentionally posted these passwords on the site?
Correct Glenn! Multiple layers of physical security in the way here even with the disclosure.
December 20, 2024 at 11:15 PM
Correct Glenn! Multiple layers of physical security in the way here even with the disclosure.
how did they not see?!?!?! 😂
December 18, 2024 at 5:15 PM
how did they not see?!?!?! 😂
i lolled loudly at this
December 18, 2024 at 5:14 PM
i lolled loudly at this
yes. we agree. and the op-ed is incredibly dumb and proof that particular outlet isn't a serious or "real" one.
December 18, 2024 at 5:02 PM
yes. we agree. and the op-ed is incredibly dumb and proof that particular outlet isn't a serious or "real" one.
ok, are you a real person? you aren't exactly engaging like a human here.
Im not arguing against bike lanes as a policy choice, I am a huge supporter. In fact, if you'll remember from about 7 minutes ago, my first post was about how stupid the OpEd attacking them as a policy choice is...
Im not arguing against bike lanes as a policy choice, I am a huge supporter. In fact, if you'll remember from about 7 minutes ago, my first post was about how stupid the OpEd attacking them as a policy choice is...
December 18, 2024 at 4:52 PM
ok, are you a real person? you aren't exactly engaging like a human here.
Im not arguing against bike lanes as a policy choice, I am a huge supporter. In fact, if you'll remember from about 7 minutes ago, my first post was about how stupid the OpEd attacking them as a policy choice is...
Im not arguing against bike lanes as a policy choice, I am a huge supporter. In fact, if you'll remember from about 7 minutes ago, my first post was about how stupid the OpEd attacking them as a policy choice is...
personal annoyance!
I am a big supporter of bike lanes as a policy choice though and am happy to continue making that annoyance a me problem. :)
I am a big supporter of bike lanes as a policy choice though and am happy to continue making that annoyance a me problem. :)
December 18, 2024 at 4:49 PM
personal annoyance!
I am a big supporter of bike lanes as a policy choice though and am happy to continue making that annoyance a me problem. :)
I am a big supporter of bike lanes as a policy choice though and am happy to continue making that annoyance a me problem. :)
im sure you are aware, but thats not me in that video.
And I get it, me not liking bike lanes but also supporting them is nuanced and complicated for social media, but, my point remains: this oped is incredibly dumb.\
And I get it, me not liking bike lanes but also supporting them is nuanced and complicated for social media, but, my point remains: this oped is incredibly dumb.\
December 18, 2024 at 4:48 PM
im sure you are aware, but thats not me in that video.
And I get it, me not liking bike lanes but also supporting them is nuanced and complicated for social media, but, my point remains: this oped is incredibly dumb.\
And I get it, me not liking bike lanes but also supporting them is nuanced and complicated for social media, but, my point remains: this oped is incredibly dumb.\
But how can we trust the party apparatus will support a leader anyone will trust?
Even after this election, they don't see the problem.
Even after this election, they don't see the problem.
November 19, 2024 at 10:23 PM
But how can we trust the party apparatus will support a leader anyone will trust?
Even after this election, they don't see the problem.
Even after this election, they don't see the problem.
he is! Term-limited in 2026, but he's our gov until then despite this statement.
November 14, 2024 at 9:58 PM
he is! Term-limited in 2026, but he's our gov until then despite this statement.
What could the "why" be here to justify this vote?
November 13, 2024 at 5:21 AM
What could the "why" be here to justify this vote?