Martin von Willebrand
@mvonwi.bsky.social
Lawyer, tech, open tech, inventing and daring to try. Biz transformation. Head of tech HH Partners. Activist and board member COSS.
Reposted by Martin von Willebrand
looks like some of them are exerting effort to make extra small steps
June 14, 2025 at 11:42 PM
looks like some of them are exerting effort to make extra small steps
Reposted by Martin von Willebrand
1. Green Berets' main objective is not "looking sharp on parade".
2. Their way of saying "I don't want to be here but they made me".
3. Kudos to whoever selected "Fortunate Son" to be played although I am sure that the irony was lost on Generalissimo Trump.
2. Their way of saying "I don't want to be here but they made me".
3. Kudos to whoever selected "Fortunate Son" to be played although I am sure that the irony was lost on Generalissimo Trump.
June 15, 2025 at 6:19 AM
1. Green Berets' main objective is not "looking sharp on parade".
2. Their way of saying "I don't want to be here but they made me".
3. Kudos to whoever selected "Fortunate Son" to be played although I am sure that the irony was lost on Generalissimo Trump.
2. Their way of saying "I don't want to be here but they made me".
3. Kudos to whoever selected "Fortunate Son" to be played although I am sure that the irony was lost on Generalissimo Trump.
Waiting, and playing along with a suitable tune "We support Trump's efforts in ending the Russia-Ukraine war", and hoping enough time passes so that the next election would take care of the problem.
The approach has several problems one of which is that the "next" election likely doesn't help.
The approach has several problems one of which is that the "next" election likely doesn't help.
June 10, 2025 at 3:17 PM
Waiting, and playing along with a suitable tune "We support Trump's efforts in ending the Russia-Ukraine war", and hoping enough time passes so that the next election would take care of the problem.
The approach has several problems one of which is that the "next" election likely doesn't help.
The approach has several problems one of which is that the "next" election likely doesn't help.
Reposted by Martin von Willebrand
They tried to humiliate. They tried to dehumanize. But they failed.
💬 He stands. He heals. He remembers. And he is not alone.
🇺🇦 Ukraine will never forget its heroes.
💬 He stands. He heals. He remembers. And he is not alone.
🇺🇦 Ukraine will never forget its heroes.
June 10, 2025 at 8:26 AM
They tried to humiliate. They tried to dehumanize. But they failed.
💬 He stands. He heals. He remembers. And he is not alone.
🇺🇦 Ukraine will never forget its heroes.
💬 He stands. He heals. He remembers. And he is not alone.
🇺🇦 Ukraine will never forget its heroes.
Would like to hear more analysis of this.
What is the actual retaliation capability of Russia, besides words? Is Russia anyhow hitting with all they've got? And the only impact of operation Spiderweb is downwards? Or are they really hitting harder?
What is the actual retaliation capability of Russia, besides words? Is Russia anyhow hitting with all they've got? And the only impact of operation Spiderweb is downwards? Or are they really hitting harder?
June 10, 2025 at 9:11 AM
Would like to hear more analysis of this.
What is the actual retaliation capability of Russia, besides words? Is Russia anyhow hitting with all they've got? And the only impact of operation Spiderweb is downwards? Or are they really hitting harder?
What is the actual retaliation capability of Russia, besides words? Is Russia anyhow hitting with all they've got? And the only impact of operation Spiderweb is downwards? Or are they really hitting harder?
Reposted by Martin von Willebrand
Notice the marked drop in cruise missiles being fired. Either they're running short of missiles, or taking half their strategic bombing fleet out behind the woodsheds last week did wonders.
June 10, 2025 at 8:38 AM
Notice the marked drop in cruise missiles being fired. Either they're running short of missiles, or taking half their strategic bombing fleet out behind the woodsheds last week did wonders.
Money seems the best use case for stablecoins and bitcoin. Transaction cost solutions - for the use case of payments - have been proven workable.
Re defi products and crypto, well, those don't seem to have a working use case, at least no wider one.
Re defi products and crypto, well, those don't seem to have a working use case, at least no wider one.
June 9, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Money seems the best use case for stablecoins and bitcoin. Transaction cost solutions - for the use case of payments - have been proven workable.
Re defi products and crypto, well, those don't seem to have a working use case, at least no wider one.
Re defi products and crypto, well, those don't seem to have a working use case, at least no wider one.