@mungushughe.bsky.social
Says the person who said ”by sex I mean sex as a trait but also I don’t because I’m counting both and neither”
November 19, 2025 at 8:20 AM
Says the person who said ”by sex I mean sex as a trait but also I don’t because I’m counting both and neither”
Nope, explaining the meaning. That’s a definition. Try again. This time don’t lie.
November 19, 2025 at 8:19 AM
Nope, explaining the meaning. That’s a definition. Try again. This time don’t lie.
Except this part: “we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait: a trait of an individual.”
Since you acknowledge that both and neither are not a part of ”sex as a trait” that leaves two, does it not? :)
Since you acknowledge that both and neither are not a part of ”sex as a trait” that leaves two, does it not? :)
November 19, 2025 at 8:18 AM
Except this part: “we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait: a trait of an individual.”
Since you acknowledge that both and neither are not a part of ”sex as a trait” that leaves two, does it not? :)
Since you acknowledge that both and neither are not a part of ”sex as a trait” that leaves two, does it not? :)
How was it my misunderstanding? be specific
November 19, 2025 at 8:16 AM
How was it my misunderstanding? be specific
Nope. “i stand by my words”
Lying again I see
Lying again I see
November 19, 2025 at 8:16 AM
Nope. “i stand by my words”
Lying again I see
Lying again I see
Oh the irony.
November 19, 2025 at 7:39 AM
Oh the irony.
Do you ever feel bad about blatantly lying?
I mean, why should **anyone** trust you when you do this?
I mean, why should **anyone** trust you when you do this?
November 19, 2025 at 7:29 AM
Do you ever feel bad about blatantly lying?
I mean, why should **anyone** trust you when you do this?
I mean, why should **anyone** trust you when you do this?
I will quote you as much as needed. We can continue this as long as you want.
You fucked up. You know you did.
Have some integrity.
You fucked up. You know you did.
Have some integrity.
a man wearing a purple vest and bow tie is sitting at a desk .
ALT: a man wearing a purple vest and bow tie is sitting at a desk .
media.tenor.com
November 19, 2025 at 7:28 AM
I will quote you as much as needed. We can continue this as long as you want.
You fucked up. You know you did.
Have some integrity.
You fucked up. You know you did.
Have some integrity.
Nope. I’ll quote you as much as needed
November 19, 2025 at 7:27 AM
Nope. I’ll quote you as much as needed
You lose.
stupid or pretending to be stupid?
stupid or pretending to be stupid?
November 19, 2025 at 7:26 AM
You lose.
stupid or pretending to be stupid?
stupid or pretending to be stupid?
Explaining what it means
Lying again I see.
Lying again I see.
a man wearing a purple vest and bow tie is sitting at a desk .
ALT: a man wearing a purple vest and bow tie is sitting at a desk .
media.tenor.com
November 19, 2025 at 7:25 AM
Explaining what it means
Lying again I see.
Lying again I see.
Of course not; you’re demonstrating a misunderstanding.
November 19, 2025 at 7:24 AM
No. What is relevant is whether both and neither are sexes someone can have. They aren’t.
You lose
bsky.app/profile/thar...
You lose
bsky.app/profile/thar...
You’ve already replied to me explaining what “sex as a trait [of an individual” means:
Perhaps, if you took more time to try to understand what I’m saying (or even asked for further clarification) rather than trying to immediately score some rhetorical points, you might know that.
Perhaps, if you took more time to try to understand what I’m saying (or even asked for further clarification) rather than trying to immediately score some rhetorical points, you might know that.
No, you’re making things up again.
My question is germane: we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait: a trait of an individual.
My question is germane: we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait: a trait of an individual.
November 19, 2025 at 7:23 AM
No. What is relevant is whether both and neither are sexes someone can have. They aren’t.
You lose
bsky.app/profile/thar...
You lose
bsky.app/profile/thar...
November 19, 2025 at 7:23 AM
No. You did not follow my advice and it bit you on the ass.Your position requires you to claim both and neither are sexes a person can have.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
a man wearing a purple vest and bow tie is sitting at a desk .
ALT: a man wearing a purple vest and bow tie is sitting at a desk .
media.tenor.com
November 19, 2025 at 7:21 AM
No. You did not follow my advice and it bit you on the ass.Your position requires you to claim both and neither are sexes a person can have.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
Your position requires that they are.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
They aren’t. You lose.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
They aren’t. You lose.
a man wearing a purple vest and bow tie is sitting at a desk .
ALT: a man wearing a purple vest and bow tie is sitting at a desk .
media.tenor.com
November 19, 2025 at 7:19 AM
Your position requires that they are.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
They aren’t. You lose.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
They aren’t. You lose.
No, it was your claim of what sex as a trait means. And it requires both and neither to be sexes a person can have.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
You loss.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
You loss.
November 19, 2025 at 7:19 AM
No, it was your claim of what sex as a trait means. And it requires both and neither to be sexes a person can have.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
You loss.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
You loss.
No. That’s a lie.
You invented the distinction and you said you stand by your words.
As both and neither are not sexes a person can have, you have proven that sex is binary by your own standards
You lose.
You invented the distinction and you said you stand by your words.
As both and neither are not sexes a person can have, you have proven that sex is binary by your own standards
You lose.
November 19, 2025 at 7:18 AM
No. That’s a lie.
You invented the distinction and you said you stand by your words.
As both and neither are not sexes a person can have, you have proven that sex is binary by your own standards
You lose.
You invented the distinction and you said you stand by your words.
As both and neither are not sexes a person can have, you have proven that sex is binary by your own standards
You lose.
You lose. I warned you about how post hoc hastily made excuses would bite you on the ass
November 19, 2025 at 7:16 AM
You lose. I warned you about how post hoc hastily made excuses would bite you on the ass
Nope, it is. You stated
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
This directly requires that to count both and neither, they must be able to be a person’s sex. You just said you stood by those words.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
This directly requires that to count both and neither, they must be able to be a person’s sex. You just said you stood by those words.
November 19, 2025 at 7:16 AM
Nope, it is. You stated
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
This directly requires that to count both and neither, they must be able to be a person’s sex. You just said you stood by those words.
“we often talk about “a person’s sex”, e.g. “his sex is male” or “my sex is female” or “you are male”. That is sex as an individual trait”
This directly requires that to count both and neither, they must be able to be a person’s sex. You just said you stood by those words.
Nope. That was the central premise. Like I said, we are not changing topics.
Either you are too stupid to understand the difference or you are pretending to.
Which is it?
Either you are too stupid to understand the difference or you are pretending to.
Which is it?
November 19, 2025 at 7:01 AM
Nope. That was the central premise. Like I said, we are not changing topics.
Either you are too stupid to understand the difference or you are pretending to.
Which is it?
Either you are too stupid to understand the difference or you are pretending to.
Which is it?
See, pretending to be stupid again or just being stupid again.
So is your reading comprehension bad or is this just more dishonesty? Since you’re doing this again, I’m calling you out
So is your reading comprehension bad or is this just more dishonesty? Since you’re doing this again, I’m calling you out
November 19, 2025 at 7:00 AM
See, pretending to be stupid again or just being stupid again.
So is your reading comprehension bad or is this just more dishonesty? Since you’re doing this again, I’m calling you out
So is your reading comprehension bad or is this just more dishonesty? Since you’re doing this again, I’m calling you out
You need to work on your reading skills if you aren’t pretending to be stupid. I didn’t say definition of sex. I said you said it was your definition of “sex as a trait”.
But great, you stand by it.
So, can a person’s sex be “both“ or “neither“?
But great, you stand by it.
So, can a person’s sex be “both“ or “neither“?
November 19, 2025 at 6:58 AM
You need to work on your reading skills if you aren’t pretending to be stupid. I didn’t say definition of sex. I said you said it was your definition of “sex as a trait”.
But great, you stand by it.
So, can a person’s sex be “both“ or “neither“?
But great, you stand by it.
So, can a person’s sex be “both“ or “neither“?
You need to work on your reading skills if you aren’t pretending to be stupid. I didn’t say definition of sex. I said you said it was your definition of “sex as a trait”.
But great, you stand by it.
So, can a person’s sex be “both“ or “neither“?
But great, you stand by it.
So, can a person’s sex be “both“ or “neither“?
November 19, 2025 at 6:58 AM
You need to work on your reading skills if you aren’t pretending to be stupid. I didn’t say definition of sex. I said you said it was your definition of “sex as a trait”.
But great, you stand by it.
So, can a person’s sex be “both“ or “neither“?
But great, you stand by it.
So, can a person’s sex be “both“ or “neither“?
Oh? But I’ve already given my position. Both and neither cannot be a person’s sex.
You’re the one whose claim requires that they are sexes
You’re the one whose claim requires that they are sexes
November 19, 2025 at 6:55 AM
Oh? But I’ve already given my position. Both and neither cannot be a person’s sex.
You’re the one whose claim requires that they are sexes
You’re the one whose claim requires that they are sexes