Mu Meson
banner
mumeson.bsky.social
Mu Meson
@mumeson.bsky.social
Mechanist
Developer, EVE Cognition™️
therealmumeson@proton.me
If this cannot be done reliably on Earth, under known conditions, then confidence in sustained human missions to Mars deserves closer scrutiny.
February 11, 2026 at 5:55 AM
Science loses trust when abstraction stops mapping the world and starts defending the model. The further physics moves into unobservable domains, the more it trades mechanism for mathematical insulation. People sense the shift, and they withdraw confidence.
November 28, 2025 at 7:09 PM
This is how bubbles form: optimism built on assumptions the architecture cannot fulfill.
November 27, 2025 at 2:32 PM
And investors, some at taxpayer expense (e.g., DARPA), are throwing billions of dollars at something they clearly don't understand.
LLMs are 1% hardware, 1% software and 98% hype.
November 27, 2025 at 2:27 PM
The fraud is not the technology; it is the narrative that treats probabilistic token engines as emerging minds. The commercial ecosystem is inflating capability claims far beyond what the underlying architecture can deliver. The gap between marketing and mechanism is the problem.
November 27, 2025 at 2:24 PM
Scaling expands coverage and fluency, not cognition. Without a mechanism for autonomous model formation, grounded reference, or self-generated abstraction, the system remains a refined text-predictor.
November 27, 2025 at 2:19 PM
Dirty anomaly.
November 25, 2025 at 2:13 PM
While no single error explains the full anomaly, the total uncertainty budget of the period comfortably encompassed the magnitude of the eventual residual.
November 25, 2025 at 2:11 PM
For those who believe "AI" (LLM) does all of my work, here you go:
November 25, 2025 at 2:06 PM
Conclusion:
Galactic dynamics do not require a single dark-matter entity performing incompatible tasks. Once the roles are separated, the contradictions evaporate and the rotation-curve problem becomes tractable rather than paradoxical.
November 25, 2025 at 12:14 PM
What it does not accomplish:
It does not specify the physical identity of each interactor.
It does not eliminate the need for an extended mass component.
It does not solve cosmological constraints.
It simply removes an unnecessary compression.
November 25, 2025 at 12:14 PM
What this perspective does accomplish:
It reframes rotation curves as a mapping problem.
You identify which interactor produces which radial effect, instead of assuming one exotic substance explains all regimes.
November 25, 2025 at 12:13 PM