@multiltricker.bsky.social
You never were a fan were you! 😆
January 20, 2026 at 7:13 PM
You never were a fan were you! 😆
Daily Mail in the centre?!
January 15, 2026 at 7:30 PM
Daily Mail in the centre?!
"..we see it now with Braverman on migration, does Braverman really want 2 sort out the problem with small boats, no, she wants to exploit it, does she really think that the Rwanda policy's the thing that's going 2 fix this problem? No, it's a way of exploiting it politically..."
October 26, 2025 at 12:24 PM
"..we see it now with Braverman on migration, does Braverman really want 2 sort out the problem with small boats, no, she wants to exploit it, does she really think that the Rwanda policy's the thing that's going 2 fix this problem? No, it's a way of exploiting it politically..."
"U can have whatever criticism u want of Blair's government or any government that went before it, but in my lifetime, in ur lifetime, most politicians whether we like them or not, have genuinely been trying 2 wrestle with problems in their in-tray. What the populist does is try to exploit them"
October 26, 2025 at 12:19 PM
"U can have whatever criticism u want of Blair's government or any government that went before it, but in my lifetime, in ur lifetime, most politicians whether we like them or not, have genuinely been trying 2 wrestle with problems in their in-tray. What the populist does is try to exploit them"
Thanks Ian! Much appreciated! V. Funny!
October 11, 2025 at 11:22 AM
Thanks Ian! Much appreciated! V. Funny!
Can't find the 'so I dated a Hegelian' reddit thing Ian mentioned!
October 1, 2025 at 4:58 PM
Can't find the 'so I dated a Hegelian' reddit thing Ian mentioned!
Your Dutch is amazing Karin!
July 3, 2025 at 8:50 PM
Your Dutch is amazing Karin!
Thanks for the thread @eliothiggins.bsky.social .
I watched a talk of yours on youtube about 'disordered discourse' but am still confused why you've used the adjective 'disordered', what are you juxtaposing it against? What would be 'ordered' discourse?
I watched a talk of yours on youtube about 'disordered discourse' but am still confused why you've used the adjective 'disordered', what are you juxtaposing it against? What would be 'ordered' discourse?
June 27, 2025 at 7:47 PM
Thanks for the thread @eliothiggins.bsky.social .
I watched a talk of yours on youtube about 'disordered discourse' but am still confused why you've used the adjective 'disordered', what are you juxtaposing it against? What would be 'ordered' discourse?
I watched a talk of yours on youtube about 'disordered discourse' but am still confused why you've used the adjective 'disordered', what are you juxtaposing it against? What would be 'ordered' discourse?
You, grumpy?!
June 22, 2025 at 6:42 PM
You, grumpy?!
You mean you actually read all those books and write those Origin story scripts yourself?!!!
Are you mad?
You could be spending that time eating ice cream or something.
Are you mad?
You could be spending that time eating ice cream or something.
June 18, 2025 at 7:39 PM
You mean you actually read all those books and write those Origin story scripts yourself?!!!
Are you mad?
You could be spending that time eating ice cream or something.
Are you mad?
You could be spending that time eating ice cream or something.
Think so. On the 22nd of April right
June 17, 2025 at 11:09 AM
Think so. On the 22nd of April right
Have insurers independently noticed changes in turbulence?
June 10, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Have insurers independently noticed changes in turbulence?
Ian Dunt (yes even is laugh) is awesome!
June 6, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Ian Dunt (yes even is laugh) is awesome!
Thanks,
That clarifies things.
So assuming the deficit remained constant for 10 years at 1.8trillion then you'd expect 36+18=54trillion
whereas if it becomes 2.2trillion then in 10 years it will be 58trillion
That clarifies things.
So assuming the deficit remained constant for 10 years at 1.8trillion then you'd expect 36+18=54trillion
whereas if it becomes 2.2trillion then in 10 years it will be 58trillion
May 24, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Thanks,
That clarifies things.
So assuming the deficit remained constant for 10 years at 1.8trillion then you'd expect 36+18=54trillion
whereas if it becomes 2.2trillion then in 10 years it will be 58trillion
That clarifies things.
So assuming the deficit remained constant for 10 years at 1.8trillion then you'd expect 36+18=54trillion
whereas if it becomes 2.2trillion then in 10 years it will be 58trillion
I was a bit confused by this episode.
The stat seems to be raise the debt (36 trillion) by 4trillion over 10 years as if this is huge. Does this mean each year the debt gets 4trillion bigger or just 400billion? Because the debt in 2023 was 2+trillion bigger than in 2022 (31 vs 33 trillion)
Anyone?
The stat seems to be raise the debt (36 trillion) by 4trillion over 10 years as if this is huge. Does this mean each year the debt gets 4trillion bigger or just 400billion? Because the debt in 2023 was 2+trillion bigger than in 2022 (31 vs 33 trillion)
Anyone?
May 23, 2025 at 7:37 PM
I was a bit confused by this episode.
The stat seems to be raise the debt (36 trillion) by 4trillion over 10 years as if this is huge. Does this mean each year the debt gets 4trillion bigger or just 400billion? Because the debt in 2023 was 2+trillion bigger than in 2022 (31 vs 33 trillion)
Anyone?
The stat seems to be raise the debt (36 trillion) by 4trillion over 10 years as if this is huge. Does this mean each year the debt gets 4trillion bigger or just 400billion? Because the debt in 2023 was 2+trillion bigger than in 2022 (31 vs 33 trillion)
Anyone?
Give it till 2062 when it will be 50 years.
May 21, 2025 at 8:38 PM
Give it till 2062 when it will be 50 years.
Is this a podcast aswell? If so I would listen!
May 2, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Is this a podcast aswell? If so I would listen!
Most excellent!
April 29, 2025 at 7:34 PM
Most excellent!
I ran into this problem too!
April 28, 2025 at 9:12 PM
I ran into this problem too!
You must be so bored of Vienna by now! 😜
April 27, 2025 at 7:53 PM
You must be so bored of Vienna by now! 😜
Who made this plot?
April 23, 2025 at 9:45 PM
Who made this plot?
What year?
April 18, 2025 at 7:55 PM
What year?
I also figured stopping 'liking' is important as well.
I hear what ur saying but the implicit assumption is that views=exposure to adverts. So in the short term ur right, but in the longer term, people like me dilute that correlation. Imagine for e.g. everyone found a way to block all the adverts?
I hear what ur saying but the implicit assumption is that views=exposure to adverts. So in the short term ur right, but in the longer term, people like me dilute that correlation. Imagine for e.g. everyone found a way to block all the adverts?
February 15, 2025 at 10:03 AM
I also figured stopping 'liking' is important as well.
I hear what ur saying but the implicit assumption is that views=exposure to adverts. So in the short term ur right, but in the longer term, people like me dilute that correlation. Imagine for e.g. everyone found a way to block all the adverts?
I hear what ur saying but the implicit assumption is that views=exposure to adverts. So in the short term ur right, but in the longer term, people like me dilute that correlation. Imagine for e.g. everyone found a way to block all the adverts?