Molly Murphy
@mullymorphy.bsky.social
ECR researching all things counterspeech and democratic speech • they/them
Reposted by Molly Murphy
Anti-dialogic counterspeech disrupts harmful public discourse not by engaging in deliberation but by frustrating it. It is a respite for those excluded from the public sphere.
Brilliant article @mullymorphy.bsky.social. Must read for all
#delibdem scholars.
doi.org/10.1080/0034...
Brilliant article @mullymorphy.bsky.social. Must read for all
#delibdem scholars.
doi.org/10.1080/0034...
Shaming, Condemning, and Calling for Consequences: Contemporary Anti-dialogic Responses to Harmful Speakers in Public Discourse
Many now criticise the purported tendency to condemn, shame, or call for consequences for those we disagree with in public debate, suggesting these actions are the antithesis of democratic particip...
doi.org
December 5, 2024 at 7:52 AM
Anti-dialogic counterspeech disrupts harmful public discourse not by engaging in deliberation but by frustrating it. It is a respite for those excluded from the public sphere.
Brilliant article @mullymorphy.bsky.social. Must read for all
#delibdem scholars.
doi.org/10.1080/0034...
Brilliant article @mullymorphy.bsky.social. Must read for all
#delibdem scholars.
doi.org/10.1080/0034...
Reposted by Molly Murphy
"...as an anti-deliberative expression, anti-dialogic counterspeech can draw attention to and catalyse deliberation about neglected issues in public discourse, particularly those affecting socially marginalised groups."
Creating a better conversation by rejecting a bad one?
#philsky #polsky
Creating a better conversation by rejecting a bad one?
#philsky #polsky
Shaming, Condemning, and Calling for Consequences: Contemporary Anti-dialogic Responses to Harmful Speakers in Public Discourse
Many now criticise the purported tendency to condemn, shame, or call for consequences for those we disagree with in public debate, suggesting these actions are the antithesis of democratic particip...
www.tandfonline.com
December 16, 2024 at 9:18 AM
Reposted by Molly Murphy
Do shaming, condemning, and calling for social & professional consequences imperil public debate? In our new paper, Molly Morphy argues these are a route to empowerment for marginalised voices & a catalyst for inclusive democratic debate
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
Shaming, Condemning, and Calling for Consequences: Contemporary Anti-dialogic Responses to Harmful Speakers in Public Discourse
Many now criticise the purported tendency to condemn, shame, or call for consequences for those we disagree with in public debate, suggesting these actions are the antithesis of democratic particip...
www.tandfonline.com
November 18, 2024 at 3:48 PM
Do shaming, condemning, and calling for social & professional consequences imperil public debate? In our new paper, Molly Morphy argues these are a route to empowerment for marginalised voices & a catalyst for inclusive democratic debate
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....