"Klein and Thompson do not seem to realize that their proposals would also entail large-scale redistribution and that the ills they seek to cure are the result of inequality rather than regulation, because they do not seem to understand how prices and property work in capitalism."

Thank you for reading.

The reason I decided to answer is because it gets to the heart of what accessibility is and why no one should be "certifying" something as accessible or declaring it a "gold standard."

Bureaucrats deciding to withhold physician-recommended care. And the elected politicians refusing to intervene. Why do we even need you if you aren't willing to serve your purpose to the electorate?
@davidebybc.bsky.social @josieosborne.bsky.social

Do we as a society withhold medical care during the palliative stage of life? Care that is recommended by their physicians, makes them more comfortable, and prevents complications? I didn't think we did. This is the exact opposite of what palliative care is about.

I also talk about something that has been on my mind for some time, a declaration of rights for the dying.

open.substack.com/pub/mssineno...

The “tragic” element having less to do with their arrested adolescent angst than our obligation to live in the world they make of it.

What is needed are overlapping comprehensive enforceable policies that don't leave wiggle room for employers' excuses for failing to create conditions that protect workers well-being.