Ms. H
banner
msh-australia.bsky.social
Ms. H
@msh-australia.bsky.social
Mother, wife, daughter of a matriarch, fierce protector of women’s and girls’ rights. Adult human female. Realist.
Of course it is. Anyone involved in paediatric ‘gender affirming care’ should be in jail. It’s a medical scandal.
December 10, 2025 at 9:10 PM
Reposted by Ms. H
The absolute sickener for me was the claim that women who had double mastectomies after suffering from breast cancer were being refused access to women’s spaces. The lies that they will tell to suit their narrative are never ending and it’s utterly despicable.
June 18, 2025 at 8:53 AM
You think that children are capable of informed consent for such surgeries and medicalisation?
June 18, 2025 at 12:26 PM
Interesting. What these tests will ultimately reveal is which athletes are eligible to compete in the women’s boxing category.

A woman with XX chromosomes or absence of Y chromosomal material (SRY gene) or with a DSD without male androgenisation will be eligible to compete in the female category.
June 3, 2025 at 10:50 AM
Yes, we should welcome all women into our single-sex spaces no matter how they present/identify.

The same is true for men and their single-sex spaces of course.
June 2, 2025 at 7:50 AM
Women didn’t do this. It was the overweening demands of the trans activists insisting that men enter women’s spaces that have caused women to now be scared of and question other women in our single-sex spaces.

Thankfully, it’s very rare as your search/examples have shown.
June 2, 2025 at 7:40 AM
It’s happened a handful of times. Most women I’ve spoken to would rather be questioned (and easily talk it through) than have blokes in their toilets and change-rooms. But thank you for your concern on our behalf.

Oh, and your misogyny is showing bud.
June 2, 2025 at 6:09 AM
The example you’ve posted speaks specifically to the fact that Khelif likely has a male DSD condition, e.g. 5-ARD?

This has nothing to do with how ‘feminine’ or ‘masculine’ Khelif is - it’s all about his/her sex and eligibility to compete in women’s boxing.
June 2, 2025 at 5:59 AM
So why are you talking complete bollocks about physical checks of children then? Just stop with the gaslighting and scaremongering.
June 2, 2025 at 5:53 AM
It’s a cheek swab Sascha … performed once in an elite athlete’s career.
June 2, 2025 at 3:03 AM
Missy Marlowe - the ‘80s/‘90s gymnast? Why would anyone wish to ban her - she’s a woman isn’t she?

I haven’t responded because your comments are illogical.
archive.md
June 1, 2025 at 10:26 PM
archive.md
June 1, 2025 at 10:13 PM
No one’s ridiculing Imane for ‘having masculine traits’. We want to understand if Khelif’s androgenisation is that of someone with a male DSD condition. If so, Khelif should not be competing in women’s boxing.
June 1, 2025 at 9:57 AM
The crux of the whole thing is to ensure that male athletes don’t compete in women’s elite sports.

In ~99.9% of cases, a buccal (cheek) swab will categorically show if someone is male or female. For any test discrepancies, more detailed testing will be undertaken to rule out certain DSD conditions.
May 31, 2025 at 11:11 PM
I’m glad that’s understood Mike. So, if you do have knowledge about DSDs, it will be crystal clear to you what the implications are of Khelif having a diagnosis of 5-ARD.
May 31, 2025 at 11:04 PM
The ADDITIONAL testing will only be required for anyone who has an errant result in their buccal test. It’s a one-off test in an elite athlete’s lifetime.

Someone’s ‘medical information’ about their sex is of course applicable to the fairness and integrity of elite sports.
May 31, 2025 at 10:53 PM