Matthew Scott
@mscottcumbria.bsky.social
Retired. Living a blissful 2nd life of happiness in Cumbria with my wife Fiona. Interests: photography, history, books, film, space, music.
Nope. Definitely Magic. Wizardry. Sorcery.
Mother was a Maths teacher. I scraped O Level. Understood nowt…..😳🤪
Mother was a Maths teacher. I scraped O Level. Understood nowt…..😳🤪
October 28, 2025 at 11:05 PM
Nope. Definitely Magic. Wizardry. Sorcery.
Mother was a Maths teacher. I scraped O Level. Understood nowt…..😳🤪
Mother was a Maths teacher. I scraped O Level. Understood nowt…..😳🤪
6 months ago today he left us. 😞
October 24, 2025 at 4:57 PM
6 months ago today he left us. 😞
10 years ago I watched XH558 give a display at Gaydon (a former V bomber airfield).
Big, fat, & certainly dirty. But oh my, what a thing to see fly. That ‘howl’….
Love that a pigeon photo-bombed it…..😂
Big, fat, & certainly dirty. But oh my, what a thing to see fly. That ‘howl’….
Love that a pigeon photo-bombed it…..😂
October 4, 2025 at 7:30 PM
10 years ago I watched XH558 give a display at Gaydon (a former V bomber airfield).
Big, fat, & certainly dirty. But oh my, what a thing to see fly. That ‘howl’….
Love that a pigeon photo-bombed it…..😂
Big, fat, & certainly dirty. But oh my, what a thing to see fly. That ‘howl’….
Love that a pigeon photo-bombed it…..😂
“No regrettable posts”…….unlike Tyler Cowan. Who works for Anthropic - an AI firm. 🙄
As for AI actors, scripts etc. - I think not (to put it mildly). 🤬
As for AI actors, scripts etc. - I think not (to put it mildly). 🤬
October 3, 2025 at 1:18 PM
“No regrettable posts”…….unlike Tyler Cowan. Who works for Anthropic - an AI firm. 🙄
As for AI actors, scripts etc. - I think not (to put it mildly). 🤬
As for AI actors, scripts etc. - I think not (to put it mildly). 🤬
They will also have to prove that projecting beams of light = ‘electronic communication’ - a debatable point. That the images were ‘sent to another person’ (specifically). Added to which they will have to show the images or words are ‘indecent’ or ‘grossly offensive’ in English law. Seems unlikely.
September 17, 2025 at 3:58 PM
They will also have to prove that projecting beams of light = ‘electronic communication’ - a debatable point. That the images were ‘sent to another person’ (specifically). Added to which they will have to show the images or words are ‘indecent’ or ‘grossly offensive’ in English law. Seems unlikely.