Berkson’s paradox.
December 21, 2025 at 6:56 PM
Berkson’s paradox.
1. It's racist to oppose the box.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
December 17, 2025 at 10:52 AM
1. It's racist to oppose the box.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
1. It's racist to oppose the box.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
December 17, 2025 at 10:49 AM
1. It's racist to oppose the box.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
Remedial math & reading?
It’s worse than I thought. I’ll sell my bonds.
It’s worse than I thought. I’ll sell my bonds.
November 20, 2025 at 9:33 PM
Remedial math & reading?
It’s worse than I thought. I’ll sell my bonds.
It’s worse than I thought. I’ll sell my bonds.
Yes, it’s all very complicated, the extraordinarily well documented obvious thing [bending over backwards to indirectly discriminate in admissions & hiring based on race that must be celebrated and then not mentioned].
November 20, 2025 at 9:00 PM
Yes, it’s all very complicated, the extraordinarily well documented obvious thing [bending over backwards to indirectly discriminate in admissions & hiring based on race that must be celebrated and then not mentioned].
1. It's racist to oppose the box.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
November 20, 2025 at 8:31 PM
1. It's racist to oppose the box.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
That’s a lot of words for taking pre-algebra in college is good actually.
November 20, 2025 at 7:31 PM
That’s a lot of words for taking pre-algebra in college is good actually.
1. It's racist to oppose the box.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
November 20, 2025 at 2:49 AM
1. It's racist to oppose the box.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
1. It's racist to oppose the box.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
November 20, 2025 at 2:48 AM
1. It's racist to oppose the box.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
2. It's racist to notice the box.
3. It's racist to hold to any standard someone standing on the box, the existence of which must be simultaneously both promoted and denied.
Is this regarding the Kirk assassination?
September 11, 2025 at 12:19 AM
Is this regarding the Kirk assassination?
Conservatives pounce.
September 9, 2025 at 12:56 AM
Conservatives pounce.
Five years later do you have any regrets in working so hard to effectively delay Pfizer’s vaccine data release?
September 7, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Five years later do you have any regrets in working so hard to effectively delay Pfizer’s vaccine data release?