Morten F.
@mortenf.bsky.social
I post shit, I shitpost, and I muse on translation from time to time.
also, frankly, i have no desire to pretend that someone with a literal nazi totenkopf on their chest is on my side. They can fuck off all the way into the sun.
October 21, 2025 at 3:50 PM
also, frankly, i have no desire to pretend that someone with a literal nazi totenkopf on their chest is on my side. They can fuck off all the way into the sun.
yeah, it's really taking away from his life's calling as a guard in Auschwitz that he's born now and not then.
October 21, 2025 at 3:49 PM
yeah, it's really taking away from his life's calling as a guard in Auschwitz that he's born now and not then.
"Cymru" is Wales in Welsh. Plaid Cymru is "Party of Wales"
October 21, 2025 at 12:05 PM
"Cymru" is Wales in Welsh. Plaid Cymru is "Party of Wales"
Informed consent isn't big for them, I suppose.
October 2, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Informed consent isn't big for them, I suppose.
You can literally be sued for anything. Normally, when you talk about lawsuits, you mean whether a plausible lawsuit exists, not whether it's possible for you to send a prank letter to the court. Anyone can send a prank letter to the court, sure.
September 26, 2025 at 5:03 PM
You can literally be sued for anything. Normally, when you talk about lawsuits, you mean whether a plausible lawsuit exists, not whether it's possible for you to send a prank letter to the court. Anyone can send a prank letter to the court, sure.
It's this, yeah. Democrats were already doing everything in their power to get rid of criminals, but it takes a lot of work. Manuel, who does hard manual labor on a farm? Not so hard to find.
September 17, 2025 at 5:45 AM
It's this, yeah. Democrats were already doing everything in their power to get rid of criminals, but it takes a lot of work. Manuel, who does hard manual labor on a farm? Not so hard to find.
And they indeed may not be able to, legally. I refer you to the thing you responded to - people cowering before Trump because they're cowards who don't dare to stand up to him.
September 16, 2025 at 5:09 PM
And they indeed may not be able to, legally. I refer you to the thing you responded to - people cowering before Trump because they're cowards who don't dare to stand up to him.
Yes, of course you can be fired because your boss thinks you're a goon or because he's afraid that Trump might do something. Notice that the only thing so far is people cowering before Trump, and not Trump actually doing something.
September 16, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Yes, of course you can be fired because your boss thinks you're a goon or because he's afraid that Trump might do something. Notice that the only thing so far is people cowering before Trump, and not Trump actually doing something.
No, it does not look like they have the bullets at all. I understand why you think they do, but it's because you're falling for a bunch of empty bluster without looking at how successful Trump has generally been at prosecuting his stupid bullshit in court.
September 16, 2025 at 2:44 PM
No, it does not look like they have the bullets at all. I understand why you think they do, but it's because you're falling for a bunch of empty bluster without looking at how successful Trump has generally been at prosecuting his stupid bullshit in court.
And it currently doesn't have much legal weight at all. They will certainly use it to bluster and harass, but they're mostly waving an empty gun.
He's saying "this is why we don't want to load that gun."
He's saying "this is why we don't want to load that gun."
September 16, 2025 at 2:10 PM
And it currently doesn't have much legal weight at all. They will certainly use it to bluster and harass, but they're mostly waving an empty gun.
He's saying "this is why we don't want to load that gun."
He's saying "this is why we don't want to load that gun."
Sort of - they've been wobbling back and forth on it. In particular, one update this year made chatGPT praise you as being bold, brave and an absolute fuckin' genius basically no matter what you said.
It... seems to coincide pretty well with when that poor child used chatGPT.
It... seems to coincide pretty well with when that poor child used chatGPT.
August 26, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Sort of - they've been wobbling back and forth on it. In particular, one update this year made chatGPT praise you as being bold, brave and an absolute fuckin' genius basically no matter what you said.
It... seems to coincide pretty well with when that poor child used chatGPT.
It... seems to coincide pretty well with when that poor child used chatGPT.
One could argue that, yes. The problem isn't with whether it would damage your reputation. It's about whether it's false. Not all statements can be true or false.
"Strawberries are delicious", true or false?
"Strawberries are delicious", true or false?
August 26, 2025 at 1:16 PM
One could argue that, yes. The problem isn't with whether it would damage your reputation. It's about whether it's false. Not all statements can be true or false.
"Strawberries are delicious", true or false?
"Strawberries are delicious", true or false?
No, no it does not. If you think that's what it says, you might need to polish your glasses a bit or work on getting your reading level up a bit.
It's not "should have known that it was false". It's "knew or strongly suspected that it was false"
It's not "should have known that it was false". It's "knew or strongly suspected that it was false"
August 18, 2025 at 3:23 PM
No, no it does not. If you think that's what it says, you might need to polish your glasses a bit or work on getting your reading level up a bit.
It's not "should have known that it was false". It's "knew or strongly suspected that it was false"
It's not "should have known that it was false". It's "knew or strongly suspected that it was false"
The case you are unaware of is st. Amant v. Thompson. Reckless disregard in a defamation context is when you have serious doubts as to the veracity and say it anyway.
August 18, 2025 at 3:14 PM
The case you are unaware of is st. Amant v. Thompson. Reckless disregard in a defamation context is when you have serious doubts as to the veracity and say it anyway.
No, no, she clearly had five hundred hires lined up for on boarding next day
August 15, 2025 at 5:39 PM
No, no, she clearly had five hundred hires lined up for on boarding next day
Oh, I meant exactly what I said. Either you're a credulous moron who will believe any lie or you're a dishonest moron. Probably both, to be fair.
August 15, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Oh, I meant exactly what I said. Either you're a credulous moron who will believe any lie or you're a dishonest moron. Probably both, to be fair.
Yeah, well, i guess you're just not all that committed to truth. She could make it all stop by just stopping her stupid-ass lies, but as long as she keeps lying, people who care about truth will correct her.
August 15, 2025 at 5:26 PM
Yeah, well, i guess you're just not all that committed to truth. She could make it all stop by just stopping her stupid-ass lies, but as long as she keeps lying, people who care about truth will correct her.
holy projection, batman - we're here because you and your credulous moron friend aren't concerned with whether what you're saying is substantially true - you don't even care about whether she's lying her ass off, lmao.
August 15, 2025 at 5:16 PM
holy projection, batman - we're here because you and your credulous moron friend aren't concerned with whether what you're saying is substantially true - you don't even care about whether she's lying her ass off, lmao.
I mean, yeah, I'm fine with that.
If no one likes you, that sucks, maybe you should work on yourself. People's standards aren't impossible to meet.
If no one likes you, that sucks, maybe you should work on yourself. People's standards aren't impossible to meet.
August 14, 2025 at 3:16 PM
I mean, yeah, I'm fine with that.
If no one likes you, that sucks, maybe you should work on yourself. People's standards aren't impossible to meet.
If no one likes you, that sucks, maybe you should work on yourself. People's standards aren't impossible to meet.
or in Scuba, does anyone say it with the u from underwater?
August 7, 2025 at 8:05 PM
or in Scuba, does anyone say it with the u from underwater?
"am I a licensed attorney in Virginia? Yes. Am I a licensed attorney with an office in Virginia? Also yes. Because I live in Virginia and have a home office"
the judge is unimpressed
the judge is unimpressed
August 1, 2025 at 2:30 PM
"am I a licensed attorney in Virginia? Yes. Am I a licensed attorney with an office in Virginia? Also yes. Because I live in Virginia and have a home office"
the judge is unimpressed
the judge is unimpressed
Sure! I'm just saying - whether Itch is blackmailed into removing nsfw and lgbtq stuff or is wiped from existence, it doesn't seem like they'd be of any use to you either way.
July 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM
Sure! I'm just saying - whether Itch is blackmailed into removing nsfw and lgbtq stuff or is wiped from existence, it doesn't seem like they'd be of any use to you either way.
God, you're bad at this. This is why you never get anything done lmao, you keep tilting at windmills.
July 24, 2025 at 3:49 PM
God, you're bad at this. This is why you never get anything done lmao, you keep tilting at windmills.
They would also have zero value to you if they didn't exist.
July 24, 2025 at 3:47 PM
They would also have zero value to you if they didn't exist.
The difference is that I'm willing to direct my ire at someone who can actually do something about it rather than sit around pissing and moping at the one being pressured, lmao.
Aim better.
Aim better.
July 24, 2025 at 3:46 PM
The difference is that I'm willing to direct my ire at someone who can actually do something about it rather than sit around pissing and moping at the one being pressured, lmao.
Aim better.
Aim better.