Stroud Morris
@morrisstroud.bsky.social
📍Greenland 🇬🇱 Active duty. Arctic posted. Serving in silence where geopolitics meet ice and steel.
Not here for the cults of billionaires or strongmen.I wear a uniform, not a red hat or fanboy B, Believer in service over spectacle, integrity over algorithms
Not here for the cults of billionaires or strongmen.I wear a uniform, not a red hat or fanboy B, Believer in service over spectacle, integrity over algorithms
You said it perfectly
November 14, 2025 at 10:53 PM
You said it perfectly
Won't forget that
November 14, 2025 at 10:38 PM
Won't forget that
Acting like that’s not newsworthy just lowers the bar for what power can get away with.
November 14, 2025 at 2:20 AM
Acting like that’s not newsworthy just lowers the bar for what power can get away with.
Public record limits don’t erase journalistic judgment. When a powerful predator tries to hand the press material about a presidential candidate, the story isn’t “the photo” it’s why he’s doing it and what that connection signals.
November 14, 2025 at 2:20 AM
Public record limits don’t erase journalistic judgment. When a powerful predator tries to hand the press material about a presidential candidate, the story isn’t “the photo” it’s why he’s doing it and what that connection signals.
it’s a power dynamic worth real scrutiny. Journalism should investigate patterns, not hide behind technicalities that conveniently protect the well connected.
November 14, 2025 at 1:52 AM
it’s a power dynamic worth real scrutiny. Journalism should investigate patterns, not hide behind technicalities that conveniently protect the well connected.
Public record limits don’t excuse selective blindness. When someone with Epstein’s history is pushing material about a major candidate, that’s not “old news”
November 14, 2025 at 1:52 AM
Public record limits don’t excuse selective blindness. When someone with Epstein’s history is pushing material about a major candidate, that’s not “old news”
Jennings has built his whole brand on laundering GOP spin and calling it analysis. If there is a political hell, it’s reserved for people who smile while feeding the public misinformation and pretending it’s objectivity.
November 14, 2025 at 1:46 AM
Jennings has built his whole brand on laundering GOP spin and calling it analysis. If there is a political hell, it’s reserved for people who smile while feeding the public misinformation and pretending it’s objectivity.
and why someone like Epstein wanted that proximity
Journalism is not only about crimes already proven. It is about scrutinizing the power networks that shape campaigns. Ignoring that dynamic was not caution; it was deference.
Journalism is not only about crimes already proven. It is about scrutinizing the power networks that shape campaigns. Ignoring that dynamic was not caution; it was deference.
November 14, 2025 at 1:39 AM
and why someone like Epstein wanted that proximity
Journalism is not only about crimes already proven. It is about scrutinizing the power networks that shape campaigns. Ignoring that dynamic was not caution; it was deference.
Journalism is not only about crimes already proven. It is about scrutinizing the power networks that shape campaigns. Ignoring that dynamic was not caution; it was deference.
You are acting like “just a solicitation conviction” somehow made Epstein a neutral figure instead of a flashing red light. A major candidate choosing to stay in that orbit, and Epstein actively trying to feed the press material, is a story because it raises questions about judgment, influence
November 14, 2025 at 1:39 AM
You are acting like “just a solicitation conviction” somehow made Epstein a neutral figure instead of a flashing red light. A major candidate choosing to stay in that orbit, and Epstein actively trying to feed the press material, is a story because it raises questions about judgment, influence
Right? This is how the game works...twist the language, blur the lines, and hope people stop noticing the abuse happening right in front of them. Calling it out clearly is the only way to break that cycle.
November 14, 2025 at 1:26 AM
Right? This is how the game works...twist the language, blur the lines, and hope people stop noticing the abuse happening right in front of them. Calling it out clearly is the only way to break that cycle.
If the Times wanted to treat it seriously without jumping to accusations, the story isn’t “Trump +bikinis. It’s “Why Is a Major Presidential Candidate Socializing in Epstein’s Orbit, and Why Is Epstein Offering These Photos to the Press?
The headline is the question..the scrutiny..not the conviction
The headline is the question..the scrutiny..not the conviction
November 14, 2025 at 1:24 AM
If the Times wanted to treat it seriously without jumping to accusations, the story isn’t “Trump +bikinis. It’s “Why Is a Major Presidential Candidate Socializing in Epstein’s Orbit, and Why Is Epstein Offering These Photos to the Press?
The headline is the question..the scrutiny..not the conviction
The headline is the question..the scrutiny..not the conviction
Exactly...rape is never “less serious” depending on age. Trying to slice it into categories is how powerful people normalize abuse. The problem isn’t confusion
it’s a deliberate attempt to soften the outrage. That’s what’s truly wrong here.
it’s a deliberate attempt to soften the outrage. That’s what’s truly wrong here.
November 14, 2025 at 1:06 AM
Exactly...rape is never “less serious” depending on age. Trying to slice it into categories is how powerful people normalize abuse. The problem isn’t confusion
it’s a deliberate attempt to soften the outrage. That’s what’s truly wrong here.
it’s a deliberate attempt to soften the outrage. That’s what’s truly wrong here.
When people start grading abuse to defend power, it shows exactly how broken the discourse is. This isn’t “difference” it’s moral rot and it’s on full display.
November 14, 2025 at 1:03 AM
When people start grading abuse to defend power, it shows exactly how broken the discourse is. This isn’t “difference” it’s moral rot and it’s on full display.
If all you see is “bikinis” you’re missing the context that makes it newsworthy. Patterns of proximity between powerful men and vulnerable young women deserve scrutiny...refusing to even look is how media keeps handing power a free pass.
November 14, 2025 at 12:55 AM
If all you see is “bikinis” you’re missing the context that makes it newsworthy. Patterns of proximity between powerful men and vulnerable young women deserve scrutiny...refusing to even look is how media keeps handing power a free pass.
It’s not about bikinis... it’s about patterns of power and access. Dismissing it as a non-story is exactly how the warning signs around powerful men get brushed aside again and again.
November 14, 2025 at 12:48 AM
It’s not about bikinis... it’s about patterns of power and access. Dismissing it as a non-story is exactly how the warning signs around powerful men get brushed aside again and again.
The “same standards” line is a shield...they only get strict when a story risks the powerful. Calling that neutrality just masks selective caution, and that’s exactly how the powerful keep slipping away.
November 14, 2025 at 12:36 AM
The “same standards” line is a shield...they only get strict when a story risks the powerful. Calling that neutrality just masks selective caution, and that’s exactly how the powerful keep slipping away.
Defending weak excuses erodes accountability. Power thrives when people downplay red flags and scold those demanding scrutiny. Journalism survives when the public refuses complacency, not when it shields the powerful with comforting narratives.
November 14, 2025 at 12:25 AM
Defending weak excuses erodes accountability. Power thrives when people downplay red flags and scold those demanding scrutiny. Journalism survives when the public refuses complacency, not when it shields the powerful with comforting narratives.
That’s exactly the mindset that lets power skate by unchallenged. Wen the wealthy and well-connected mingle wit minors under shady circumstances, it is news.not because of bikinis, but because of the pattern of exploitation N the institutions that look away Brushing it off is how accountability dies
November 13, 2025 at 11:47 PM
That’s exactly the mindset that lets power skate by unchallenged. Wen the wealthy and well-connected mingle wit minors under shady circumstances, it is news.not because of bikinis, but because of the pattern of exploitation N the institutions that look away Brushing it off is how accountability dies
When elites bury allegations instead of investigating, it shows how broken our info ecosystem is. Demand transparency and hold every powerful figure and newsroom accountable...no more selective outrage, no more shielding the powerful. Independent scrutiny matters.
November 13, 2025 at 11:33 PM
When elites bury allegations instead of investigating, it shows how broken our info ecosystem is. Demand transparency and hold every powerful figure and newsroom accountable...no more selective outrage, no more shielding the powerful. Independent scrutiny matters.
This isn’t some media conspiracy they can pin on the left; it’s their own party dragging the skeletons out. They built the maze, they fed the lies, and now they’re choking on the fallout.
November 13, 2025 at 10:50 PM
This isn’t some media conspiracy they can pin on the left; it’s their own party dragging the skeletons out. They built the maze, they fed the lies, and now they’re choking on the fallout.