*It’s “who’s” as in short for “who is”.

Hamson

Well seasoned hams.

Conscious about making this place the sewer of the last place… are we allowed to use the other C word on here?

Shrug off the ham, Sam

Maybe. But if the farm is worthless, then they will be able to hand it down without paying any tax.
Which is what they *claim* the problem is.
But yes, very suspicious their *actual* problem is Clarkson’s, but cannot say that out loud and lose the sympathy.

Seems to me that they don’t get paid enough by their buyers. That’s the root issue that needs fixing through regulation.

But as far as IHT is concerned, I’m fairly sure that the new policy will devalue most farms removing them from the tax altogether. Would you agree?

It’s a naff BBC reconstruction of a Netflix drama.

What do *they* know?

I prefer bleat… but could work with skeet.

Well, that doesn’t work, bloody everything in this country is broken.
He’s at 12:26:18

Bleat / Bleet ?

We need to keep calling them tweets until the trademark is genericised. That’ll piss Elon’s investors off.

That would be a perfect word for the blue ticks to use as they attempt to mock those leaving Twitter.
But that’s quite advanced. First they must learn the difference between there and their.

He spent 45bn dollars. A lot, even for him. But it wasn’t all his money.
He has obligations to investors. And some of them look a bit, well, insistent.