Monoboy
LightNews LightNews
banner
monoboy.bsky.social
Monoboy
@monoboy.bsky.social
470 followers 1.5K following 150 posts
📦
Posts Replies Media Videos
monoboy.bsky.social
@jcsalterego.bsky.social Why are you on my Bluesky? 😁
Screenshot showing off a new Bluesky feature of saving posts. It shows a post from Jerry Chen.
September 8, 2025 at 7:01 PM
monoboy.bsky.social
This is the best I can do!
Longer Chinese soup spoon
June 21, 2025 at 10:40 PM
monoboy.bsky.social
May I present, the Chinese soup spoon. They also have all the cool notches so you can rest them on the side of your bowl.
Chinese soup spoon
June 21, 2025 at 10:35 PM
monoboy.bsky.social
This is a post on r/Conservative that has examples of how the information in the Signal chat could be used by enemies to counter the airstrike.
Long Reddit post giving examples of how the information from the leaked Signal chat could be used by enemies of the USA.
March 26, 2025 at 4:09 PM
monoboy.bsky.social
Why should we be buying lumber from Canada? This is why.

From here: www.tiktok.com/@dougweavera...

(Also testing out 3 minute videos)
March 12, 2025 at 3:26 AM
monoboy.bsky.social
What is an Executive Order? I found this comment on Reddit to be a good basic explanation. www.reddit.com/r/law/commen...
Post on Reddit that reads: EO's are subject to federal law and the constitution. He could write an EO renaming Thursdays to Trumpdays and if there's no federal law preventing that, it may be the position of the Executive branch to always refer to them as Trumpdays. But...short of a supporting law by Congress, there is no mandate for anyone else or any states or jurisdictions to follow along. He could write an EO directing federal agencies to do certain things (as many of these EO's are written). So long as those agencies are within his jurisdiction and the orders are lawful, there's nothing stopping those EO's from sticking. It's basically an interoffice memo. He could write an EO declaring marijuana is a top enforcement priority and since the FBI, DEA, etc. are under the Executive branch -- again, it's basically like sending an interoffice memo to those agency heads telling them what he expects of how they conduct their agencies. He could write an EO declaring counterfeiting money is legal. But, since counterfeiting currency is in violation of federal law, the EO wouldn't make any difference. *However*, since he controls the federal enforcement agencies, they could choose not to enforce it. But, even then it'd still be illegal almost everywhere under state laws. Which is broadly to say that some of these EO's will stick and many will be challenged in court. As in...there will be *hundreds* of lawsuits in the days, weeks, and months to come. In the case of the EO over birthright citizenship, it's a little bit of a grey area. The premise is to assert a reinterpretation of the "subject to the jurisdiction" phrase, much in the way the 2nd Amendment's "well-regulated militia" phrase was reinterpreted to broadly snuff out any and all gun control initiatives. This EO is setting up a court fight so they can escalate the matter to SCOTUS and see if they'll do the same for citizenship by reinterpreting what that clause means. In the meanwhile...they're going to do as …
January 21, 2025 at 8:21 PM
monoboy.bsky.social
This is what it looks like on Android
Screenshot of the Android bottom toolbar in the Bluesky app
January 17, 2025 at 9:59 PM