The "regime" is always used to describe unfavorable governments. Hence the quotes. I bring up other nations bcoz we've seen many times how the US have shoved democracy into countries only for their interests.
Iran's 1st PM was removed by the US & Shah installed. Fake democratic cries are done.

🤣 you can't land and argument so you start "blocking". No problem.
Your view gets challenged, and you go it "whataboutisms".
🤣 Good luck.

Also, what about the #IDF gunning innocents? Same? No? Regime OK? The entire region is ruled by authoritarian rulers, who are oppressing one or more peoples.
Same style different place. Don't see people calling that out much.
Need examples?

Places of workshop are sensitive & sentimental. Destroying them is a message to the "regime". But what message? "Hate Islam?" Social media is littered with Islamaphobic comments - this emboldens the crazies to go more crazy and marginalizes those who what economic, social, religious freedom.

That's totally different to causing destruction to religious sites and scaring the crap out of people who want to practise their faith peacefully.
Ayatollah Khamenei is only recognised by a portion of the Iranians even across religious domains. Your generalisation shows you are just "zio plant".

And so you Ok for reference to God on bank notes? 😜 So religion can be an extension of government if it suits and helps me cash in?

Ok your assertion is that Mosques are an apparatus of the state. So would you say that Mosques in the UAE or Saudi Arabia are extensions of the state. Would you be OK for people to destroy them for political purposes? The UAE and Saudi Arabia are allies of the USA and Europe?

Not trolling. Most agree religion has been weaponized in Iran and not the first to do so. My specific point is on destruction of religious places to make political points are not effective and rather destructive both in form and in function.
Your inability to hold more than 1 truth says it all.

And no one cares about yours.

We have lived experience. Don't assume your suffering is the only relevant one.
Iran should be secular. But your generalisation of a faith indicates it's more about hatred than freedom.

Please illuminate me how destroying a place of worship won't lead to those who are religious but do not support the Iranian government be further marginalised? So if I disagree with the Australian government, I take it out on the Cathedral? Go on please explain?

Your comment shows your inability to hold more than 2 truths.
1. You cannot decolonise a faith as it is an intangible set of value.
2. The Iranian government of today has been harsh on its people
3. Destroying buildings instead of repurposing them shows how unintelligent some Iranians are.

I can see many European states turning eastwards giving the US administration of late basically upending any semblance of international law.

Being satirical: NATO plan involves engaging it's biggest partner to defend itself from the USA? 😜

America Fork Ya!

😜