In Philosophy of Nature, Feyerabend says that his position can be seen as exploring the implications of Levi-Strauss' ideas on myths for the phil of sci. I think it's a fascinating connection, especially given his indirect but significant influence on STS & the strong programme.

The paper you shared seems to be telling a different story, or am I missing something here?

But look what Nagel says in that very book about standpoints and objectivity:

4/ Critics claim 0.049 ≠ 0.051 is meaningless. This leads us into the **Sorites Paradox**: One grain of sand is not a heap. If we add one more sand to it, it still isn't - so if N sand is not a heap, and N+1 sand is not a heap…