Ah, there it is.

Based on your other replies on this app (i.e. your implications Bluesky should allow hate speech), you are an antagonizer to the left. So no. Your “clever” comment must be taken as it implies.

Of course I meant you. You called a poster crazy for supporting background checks. Your gaslighting doesn’t work here.

If you (now) acknowledge Bluesky is not the gov’t and does not have any reason to follow the constitution, then why are you arguing so adamantly here? Private companies have every right to not allow hate speech. Yet you keep trying to imply Bsky is in the wrong by using “free speech” improperly.

So you don’t agree that top government positions should have background checks?

That’s truly absurd. Even you must know that.

Exactly what I was thinking.

This is you, in fact, saying free speech is guaranteed by the constitution and bluesky should adhere to that. 🤔