Evan Miyazono
miyazono.bsky.social
Evan Miyazono
@miyazono.bsky.social
Presumption of innocence for people, not software
(may I never stop pointing technologists to the federalist papers)
February 27, 2025 at 4:56 AM
totally agree! Other books I consider pleasant surprises in this category are
Foundations of Decision Analysis by Howard and Abbas,
quantum.country, and
arxiv.org/abs/1803.05316 for Category Theory
Seven Sketches in Compositionality: An Invitation to Applied Category Theory
This book is an invitation to discover advanced topics in category theory through concrete, real-world examples. It aims to give a tour: a gentle, quick introduction to guide later exploration. The to...
arxiv.org
February 9, 2025 at 10:38 PM
So I went longer between finishing the first and starting the second than I did between starting the second and finishing the fourth. I'd definitely recommend starting into the second if you haven't to see if the momentum catches you.
December 27, 2024 at 8:09 PM
Also reminds me of the Utopian Oath from @adapalmer.bsky.social's Terra Ignota series (what such a monastic sacrifice might look like today). I don't know if you've read the series but @benreinhardt.bsky.social, @divya.bsky.social and I all love it.
December 27, 2024 at 7:45 PM
reminds me of
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handica... (non-choice sacrifice of resources)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altruis... (sacrificing for the good of the family/tribe)

but both kinda advance fitness of shared genes, due to natural selection + selection bias (is "natural selection bias" a term?)
Handicap principle - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
December 27, 2024 at 7:45 PM
These systems are inhuman intelligences, and will continue dramatically outperforming humans in more domains and (for now) underperforming in others.

If LLMs were growing more capable like a human child, I'd be a lot less worried.
December 23, 2024 at 4:59 PM
participant reviews:
"My favorite part was hearing someone else's rec - you learn something about the person giving the gift, the person receiving it, and yourself)"
"it's like watching someone open someone else's gift thinking 'yeah, nice, I'm getting myself that'"
December 20, 2024 at 10:46 PM
Step 3: The person who posed the question reveals themself and offers a recommendation.

Our recs included south-asian snacks, a Ted Chiang short story, some voyager eps, a bunch of great books, and a few movies. Plus it felt like a nice hangout and close-out.
December 20, 2024 at 10:46 PM
Step 2: randomly order participants, who choose which elicitation question they want to answer in as much detail as they want.

(e.g. the person who picks "what do you like in a story?" could say "fantasy that turns out to be scifi" or "nonfiction that's stranger than fiction")
December 20, 2024 at 10:46 PM
example preference elicitation questions:
What are your top 3 "little treats" and favorite flavor profiles?
What's one of the best holiday gifts you ever received, and why?
What do you like in a story?
December 20, 2024 at 10:46 PM
How to do it?
Step 1: everyone submits a "preference elicitation question" directly to a coordinator to anonymize (or you could make an anonymous form).

So, think of a category of rec (e.g. book, film, snack food, etc) and ask a question that will inform that rec
December 20, 2024 at 10:46 PM
Why is this a problem? Feels dumb + carbon-intensive to ship white-elephant gifts to each other. I've tried sending books, but preference between e-book, audiobook, physical book, etc is kind of a hassle.
December 20, 2024 at 10:46 PM
I'm confused - I thought they all had wheels at this size. www.cryofab.com/wp-content/u...
at least the ones I used did...
www.cryofab.com
December 11, 2024 at 1:25 AM
Makes me wonder if there are intuitive ways to quantify this. Especially if you have models of different people for something like a recommendation engine.
December 7, 2024 at 6:28 AM