Markus Millinger
millinger.bsky.social
Markus Millinger
@millinger.bsky.social
Energy systems researcher | RISE - Research institutes of Sweden
Thanks Felix, yes I agree with you, going forward. I'll take a look at the studies you posted!

We include spatial detail for biomass on the country level. Hope you enjoy the read, and happy to discuss!
January 25, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Thank you Marta! I'm happy to discuss it.
Have a nice weekend!
January 24, 2025 at 3:50 PM
That is great! I haven't seen an IAM study with e-fuels/CCU yet though, are they out yet?
January 24, 2025 at 9:29 AM
Thanks for sharing our study Adrian!
January 24, 2025 at 6:28 AM
Renewable carbon can also be sequestered for negative emissions.

Among the challenges: key technologies such as BECCUS and DACCUS have yet to take off, and not all biomass is sustainably sourced today. But I don't see how it would take off without subsidies in waiting for a reliable carbon market.
January 23, 2025 at 10:49 PM
Thank you Roger, hope you enjoy the read!
January 23, 2025 at 10:32 PM
Thank you Jonas!
January 23, 2025 at 10:28 PM
We used the state-of-the-art open-source European energy systems model PyPSA-Eur to analyse near-optimal solution spaces. Co-authors: Fredrik Hedenus, Elisabeth Zeyen @lisaze.bsky.social, Fabian Neumann @fneum.bsky.social, Lina Reichenberg and Göran Berndes.
January 23, 2025 at 1:44 PM
➡️ Policy support for sustainable biomass use alongside emerging technologies reduces energy system costs and the risk of missing emissions targets.
January 23, 2025 at 1:43 PM
We used the state-of-the-art open-source European energy systems model PyPSA-Eur to analyse near-optimal solution spaces. Co-authors: Fredrik Hedenus, Elisabeth Zeyen @lisaze.bsky.social, Fabian Neumann @fneum.bsky.social, Lina Reichenberg and Göran Berndes.
January 23, 2025 at 1:42 PM
🔹 Bioenergy with carbon capture is more cost-competitive than DAC under a wide range of assumptions. This may inhibit DAC deployment unless it is targeted by policy.
January 23, 2025 at 1:40 PM
🔹 Policies limiting biomass (residue) use likely need to be accompanied by strong policies to support a greater deployment of clean electricity, electrolytic hydrogen and direct air capture to achieve emissions targets.
January 23, 2025 at 1:40 PM
🔹 Excluding biomass increases energy system costs by ~20% under a net-negative emissions target, like excluding wind power or electrolytic hydrogen.
January 23, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Highlights:
🔹 The main value of biomass is to provide renewable carbon, rather than bioenergy. It is less central what biomass is used for if carbon is captured for reuse or sequestration.
January 23, 2025 at 1:39 PM
January 23, 2025 at 1:38 PM