Miljan Milosavljević
miljance.bsky.social
Miljan Milosavljević
@miljance.bsky.social
Microsoft MVP | Developer | Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central
#msdyn365bc

https://miljan.rs/
Oh yes, we do need that one also.
November 17, 2025 at 7:08 PM
Reposted by Miljan Milosavljević
I really appreciate your recent PRs
One add. note for partners. If you're customers are still using custom reports instead of report ext. then you need some additional code and you have to wait until this PR is merged to easily embed the XML only in the ZUGFeRD process:
github.com/microsoft/AL...
ZUGFeRD Export with custom reports by pri-kise · Pull Request #29255 · microsoft/ALAppExtensions
Summary Enable ZUGFeRD export for custom reports. Work Item(s) Fixes #29254 AB#609600
github.com
November 17, 2025 at 6:50 PM
🧑‍🔧
November 17, 2025 at 8:20 AM
I do not know much about your background but if you had to practice your communication skills, you came a long way because you are one of the nicest persons in the #msdyn365bc bubble. I feel like someone had to say this.
July 6, 2025 at 4:08 PM
Good one, hoping to see some input here.
April 28, 2025 at 10:21 AM
Yes, I have seen this way of thinking with my colleagues also. It is not wrong of course. From my point of view, this is just unnecessary. Functions should be small enough - that is more important rule from my perspective. More code impairs readability.
February 13, 2025 at 3:39 PM
Maybe other apps may be dependant on it - that way it is mandatory to have this app in order that other apps can work. Other than that I personally would not like to have an app that nobody can uninstall in my environment. Or rephrased - I advise against setting an app to "Excluded".
February 13, 2025 at 3:25 PM
That is for sure nit Microsoft had in mind with these apps. Why do you want to prevent uninstalling the app?
February 13, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Which is fine. I just do not like that this could mean that local variables should be reset at the start of the function. I feels like anti-pattern.
February 13, 2025 at 3:06 PM
I would suggest directing the question to Microsoft. I think they did not plan for anyone else them themselves to use this prefix.
February 13, 2025 at 2:55 PM
To be honest, I really dislike those stuff that are meant do to stuff "just in case" but the case cannot happen in real life. I learned to live with the fact that some other devs like to be extra cautious.
February 13, 2025 at 2:53 PM
As far as I know Microsoft uses this prefix to hide some apps in the Business Central that are actually installed. Are you trying to publish your own app with this prefix?
February 13, 2025 at 2:50 PM
With or without using service billing module?
February 7, 2025 at 5:52 PM
What I wanted to say is - people might be disturbed if Microsoft impose a rule for others but not for Microsoft apps.
February 7, 2025 at 4:51 PM