khalil
mildpredicament.bsky.social
khalil
@mildpredicament.bsky.social
Why does this matter?
Robinson’s 6’3, 6’7 WS. Small-ish. Boogie’s very much a “Cal guards shrug” inclusion. And honestly I dropped Braden Smith & Tahaad Pettiford a tier largely b/c of their size scaring me
March 12, 2025 at 12:49 AM
Demin has a 44 EFG against the top 220 teams on barttorvik. I do not believe he will be able to score at all against NBA defenses, unfortunately, he’s a really cool player. And I would be comfortable playing every guard until Fears next to another guard
March 11, 2025 at 10:35 AM
just the Ace/McNeeley spots or something else?
March 10, 2025 at 4:20 AM
what in the hell
February 27, 2025 at 7:21 PM
what makes you put xaivian lee that far ahead of javon small and bennett stirtz
February 27, 2025 at 7:20 PM
i dont necessarily mean haaland’s the bar, i mean i need to see havertz sustain a haaland-esque for a long time to believe it’s real
December 14, 2024 at 9:52 PM
the logic *was* that the number i was remembering is a number that doesnt happen at all over larger samples and thus the overall output has to be curved down obviously new information changes things (also i would frankly like to see him do even haaland xg/shot for a bigger sample)
December 14, 2024 at 8:51 PM
maybe i’m misremembering the number i saw like something approaching .3 a few weeks ago
December 14, 2024 at 8:47 PM
i know that conceptually high xg/shot is good and indicative of those things, but i’m saying the radar from this period benefits from it being at a level higher than even he can sustain, even in this team
December 14, 2024 at 8:46 PM
right, but this includes the midfield minutes, it gets above haaland territory outside that if i am not mistaken
December 14, 2024 at 8:43 PM
he has good xg/shot his whole career, it’s higher than usual for this period
December 14, 2024 at 8:41 PM
i think that ~1000 minutes of this with his history and that high of xg/shot is not at all enough to justify not signing any 1st choice attackers this summer. even if you love him, get a winger
December 14, 2024 at 8:38 PM
He ended last season on a hot finishing stretch. And this is not good enough xG+xA/90 from CF in a team this good in my opinion.
December 14, 2024 at 8:27 PM
Havertz being considered the first choice striker because of a well-timed purple patch is, in itself, bad process
December 14, 2024 at 8:17 PM
(or any other individual at any other point)
December 14, 2024 at 8:14 PM
That Rice number is also an overpay honestly. And, again, the biggest issue is that in 2 years as a team attempting to challenge for 4 trophies, we have signed zero first choice attackers intentionally, and that is bad process, regardless of the ways you can talk yourself out of Osimhen in 2024
December 14, 2024 at 8:14 PM
i enjoy watching the game as it exists but the corner three is also probably too valuable from a game design standpoint
December 14, 2024 at 8:09 PM
If the squad survived Rice making that #, it can handle Osimhen. This is the player quality disagreement I referred to earlier. He’s one of the 5 best living CFs, if the options are a bad deal for Osimhen or another year of Havertz, take the bad deal. If the Sun numbers are true I retract though.
December 14, 2024 at 8:07 PM
the numbers i saw (the sun notwithstanding) were similar to what rice makes.
December 14, 2024 at 7:59 PM
this is the first time i have thought about int’l players as a way to solve the closed system problem i am so dumb
December 14, 2024 at 7:54 PM
but there’s a strong positional value argument against doing that if he’s going to be the only huge swing.)
December 14, 2024 at 7:52 PM
Osimhen wants, like, a mild overpay for a superstar CF. It’s an overpay, no doubt, but we have reached a point in the process where it is time to take a risk to add a superhero. And this is a paths not traveled thing too, the Rice money could have been a ton of things (not complaining about Rice
December 14, 2024 at 7:52 PM