Was stört Sie an dem Inhalt des Artikels?

Mandatory impact statement: @indicator.media's article led Meta to delete hundreds of AI nudifier ads and at least 20 pages and accounts. Apple also banned two related apps. Google ignored our request for comment about a related app available on the Play store.

indicator.media/p/meta-ran-4...

Yeah, at least I feel like this will become increasingly important with all this AI slop littering the web. Not even talking deepfakes here. Even it‘s clearly visible that it‘s artificially generated, it might be nice to know for sake of transparency what tool it was generated with.

They also experiment with non-visible marks, it’s called SynthID. It’s meant to withstand cropping and manipulation. Been looking into this recently, but there isn‘t much out there yet. That‘s why I hijacked your original posting. Sorry for that - great ai art, of course. 😉

Thank you for sharing. Can‘t see one either. Apparently there should be marking bottom right. Might be white on white? Or different model, true. mashable.com/article/goog...

Is this generated by veo 3? Thought Google watermarks its ai images by now.

Thank you for crediting our work, like our recent investigation into Clothoff 🙏https://www.spiegel.de/international/zeitgeist/using-ai-to-humiliate-women-the-men-behind-deepfake-pornography-a-0de338f9-9cec-4ae8-a5ef-9a356b0a5bd4

Thank you for sharing! 🙏

A more recent @bellingcat.com investigation focused on MrDeepfakes a platform for deep faked porn videos: www.bellingcat.com/news/2025/05...

Around the same time @theguardian.com published its findings: www.theguardian.com/technology/2...

For further reading, there are also three more pieces with great background information on Clothoff and the industry in general (I bet there are more, but let's start with these three):

@bellingcat.com published this major investigation about a year ago: www.bellingcat.com/news/2024/02...