It's interesting how they don't have an actual economic answer and immediately switch to name calling, but will automatically claim victory in any argument where they're insulted by saying you can't argue the issues.

Because in this case they're too busy licking billionaire bootheel to say anything

No no, The only politics allowed discourse in the UK is the one that constantly tells us anyone with a darker tan than two weeks in Spain is a danger and evil and should have applied for asylum 4 countries ago.

You can't go offering alternatives, you just have to endlessly chase the reform vote.

And not one of them could even pass for a normal human being.

Ah, the great daily mail paradox where simultaneously we're being overrun by immigrants because we're too soft and generous but being abandoned by immigrants because they can't afford to live here anymore.

Ah, the Ricky Gervais policy.

But Reform voters don't, so Starmer will try and appease them by blasting another hole in his foot despite the fact that they'll never vote for him.

Libby with the ironic surname giving us the shittest of Christmas takes from one of the worst of newspapers.

Can't say I'm too shocked.

There are few things more confusing to me than the priority list of a politician.

Worlds burning? Next year.
Invasions? We'll get round to it.
Lunatic in the white house again? Just appease it.

Plant based sausages?
THE PEOPLE MUST BE PROTECTED!!!

Because they think telling people it's "aspirational" and disliking this level of wealth is just jealousy as one day you too could be like them if you just inherit a few million from your parents and use it to buy out other people's successful business!

That kind of nonsense people still fall for.