Mike Kazowski
@mikekazowski.bsky.social
Political theorist turned corporate lawyer. Now under pseudonym, for obvious reasons.
Are you proud of your work @danarubinsteinbsky.bsky.social ?
July 8, 2025 at 1:15 AM
Are you proud of your work @danarubinsteinbsky.bsky.social ?
Fuck off Fetterman
June 19, 2025 at 3:16 PM
Fuck off Fetterman
More turnovers than most of their games in the playoffs thus far
June 6, 2025 at 2:06 AM
More turnovers than most of their games in the playoffs thus far
It looks like they're watching the same video in real time
June 2, 2025 at 12:43 PM
It looks like they're watching the same video in real time
This is psychotic.
May 31, 2025 at 8:56 PM
This is psychotic.
No, she was not a good candidate as she does not communicate well - Dems need to learn their fucking lesson and pick someone that can communicate after the Biden disaster.
May 26, 2025 at 4:03 PM
No, she was not a good candidate as she does not communicate well - Dems need to learn their fucking lesson and pick someone that can communicate after the Biden disaster.
They seem to be in trouble. Mcconnell is torching them.
May 26, 2025 at 12:46 AM
They seem to be in trouble. Mcconnell is torching them.
The refs were generally not calling much all game, and what they did call favoured Detroit - the non-call was consistent in this case.
April 27, 2025 at 11:13 PM
The refs were generally not calling much all game, and what they did call favoured Detroit - the non-call was consistent in this case.
Of course he did.
April 20, 2025 at 9:48 PM
Of course he did.
This is absolutely disgusting.
April 16, 2025 at 9:03 PM
This is absolutely disgusting.
They're proposing to use the pro bono time offered by the law firms they've extorted to negotiate these deals - holy f-.
April 10, 2025 at 8:50 PM
They're proposing to use the pro bono time offered by the law firms they've extorted to negotiate these deals - holy f-.
Surely JD Vance is going to take issue with this, right?
March 16, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Surely JD Vance is going to take issue with this, right?