Mike "looking for research fellowship" Caulfield
banner
mikecaulfield.bsky.social
Mike "looking for research fellowship" Caulfield
@mikecaulfield.bsky.social
Author: Verified: How to Think Straight, Get Duped Less, and Make Better Decisions about What to Believe Online (University of Chicago Press).

Researcher, infolit/misinfo/rhetoric/civic reasoning. Currently researching AI as tool for critical thinking.
That's not a real will stancil tweet
November 11, 2025 at 4:43 AM
We used to call this "catch and release" for reasons I can't remember back in the day and it was seen as running a tight ship
November 9, 2025 at 2:56 AM
Electricity is more an issue, but all these data centers are serving up Netflix and TikTok when what we used to do is get into a one ton combustion machine powered by 6,000 explosions a minute to pick up a physical disc that took more energy to make than months chats.
November 8, 2025 at 8:46 PM
The average American uses enough water for 800,000 chatbot prompts. per day. That seems insane because normally we don't think about the amount of water it takes to make a single sheet of paper or (if you're in for a wild ride) to produce a hamburger or pair of jeans.
November 8, 2025 at 8:41 PM
But the simplest takeaway is this. Anything you do on a computer is going to have less water and electricity impact than anything you don't do on a computer, by orders of magnitude.
November 8, 2025 at 8:39 PM
The unfortunate thing is most of what you hear about water, electricity, and AI is misinformation. I say unfortunate because since the reality is so far removed from the story people are hearing if you say that you'll sound like a crazy person.
November 8, 2025 at 8:36 PM
Yes
November 8, 2025 at 1:02 AM
Oh wonderful, hope to see you there
November 7, 2025 at 10:40 PM
If he had tied it to a democracy agenda, in retrospect I don't think he could have pegged it to Rs and I don't think the coalition would have held long. I also didn't understand that part of this was predictive framing of the increases of open enrollment. Which is actually really astute. I was wrong
November 7, 2025 at 8:56 PM
I really really dislike him. But I'm happy to have been very wrong about how things would play out. Sometimes you have to let yourself be surprised.
November 7, 2025 at 8:51 PM
Schumer has so many issues and I thought this larger plan of his to peg to ACA would fail miserably. But he has now held a shutdown coalition together longer than anyone, made it to the ACA increase notifications, pegged this to Rs, at least slightly juiced an electoral win while doing it.
November 7, 2025 at 8:50 PM
It's not the worst aspect of social media but the naive belief that all language is expressive is very tiring. Ah yes, politicians, who famously eschew guile.
November 7, 2025 at 8:33 PM
Reposted by Mike "looking for research fellowship" Caulfield
when you start thinking of pelosi's historical peers you're thinking of people like henry clay
November 7, 2025 at 3:03 PM
I think that's exactly right. I am not saying they could never get there, who knows? But the stuff people promote currently as the end of handcrafted video games feels like the equivalent of Muzak. Great if you're in an elevator. Not something you're giving your day off to.
November 7, 2025 at 5:31 PM
Yeah, exactly. The things which get hallucinated are (somewhat) predictable; conflation errors are not.
November 7, 2025 at 4:50 PM
Not to give too much away but yeah
November 7, 2025 at 2:58 PM
Yeah I think the thing people forget is the amount of time people invest in playing these games is the true cost to the individual. It's not a carton of milk where you increase efficiency and bring down the price. It has to be filled with delight.
November 7, 2025 at 2:39 PM