I think they meant getting 6 runechants once per game for Nasreth is easy. This includes triggering your malefic before your runechants (on attack) to control 6+ runechants (on attack you only have 4 or 5). Having an attack with these req. would be way to inconsisten. But the concept is very cool.

The art is pretty cool:-)
The 7 cost makes this card unplayable.
As a 3 cost it would be a cool sideboard addition.

Not fallen ... ascended!

You won't regret it

Can you enlighten me ... what was the misprint in the aurora deck?

Old news mate ... old news ;-)

Your thumb looks like a fucking normal thumb there

Kyuss - Welcome to skyvalley

If I recall correctly, my list included 6-9 Boltn, Falcon Wings, Rabbles, E-Strikes, and 6 Blockers. Clearing dragons wasn’t great, but it was manageable. Most of the time, I had the tools to deal with the key dragons-except Ashwings. I simply couldn’t handle them. It was a very interesting MU.

Who am I to argue with advice from @hadesblade.bsky.social ? You're at least one level above me. That said, Rake has always felt oppressive to me—a card capable of deciding a match by turn 0 or 1. While it may be balanced by being significantly weaker in later rounds, I still wouldn't call it fair.

That's interesting—fair isn’t a word I’d associate with Rake the Embers. Most of my games against Dromai were as Azalea, and with my build, the matchup was super close and incredibly fun. That is, except when an early Rake hit the board. A turn 0 or 1 Rake was a near-guaranteed loss 99% of the time.

Dromai was an incredibly intriguing and dynamic deck to play (with and against). Most games felt engaging and thought-provoking— with one exception: Rake the Embers.

Coconut Chia Pudding

Have Fun :-)

No Coverage for a BH .... OK ... But no Coverage for a calling feels really weird

Will Dash IO still be playable if HO is banned, or is it a mandatory card for the (current) deck?

Felttable.com