Markus Ilkka Eronen
@mieronen.bsky.social
Philosopher of science. Associate professor, RUG. Associate editor, Theory & Psychology. Myös runoilija.
markuseronen.com
https://www.rug.nl/staff/m.i.eronen/research
markuseronen.com
https://www.rug.nl/staff/m.i.eronen/research
Thank you for inviting us! Very much looking forward to reading the other contributions, and seeing the book in print.
July 12, 2025 at 4:30 PM
Thank you for inviting us! Very much looking forward to reading the other contributions, and seeing the book in print.
Forgot to tag @bringmannlaura.bsky.social and #PhilSci
July 12, 2025 at 1:40 PM
Forgot to tag @bringmannlaura.bsky.social and #PhilSci
That is another possibility (I also refer to Uher in my paper). I decided to stick to the terminology of soft "measurement" because "measurement" is the established and deeply rooted term for what psychologists are doing. However, there is surely also a case to be made for calling it something else.
January 11, 2024 at 9:05 PM
That is another possibility (I also refer to Uher in my paper). I decided to stick to the terminology of soft "measurement" because "measurement" is the established and deeply rooted term for what psychologists are doing. However, there is surely also a case to be made for calling it something else.
I am big fan of causal inference, and I would love to have causal psychological measurements! I just think we (mostly) can't have them, in practice.
January 11, 2024 at 8:59 PM
I am big fan of causal inference, and I would love to have causal psychological measurements! I just think we (mostly) can't have them, in practice.
Many thanks for the kind words and for posting the paper, happy that you liked it!
January 11, 2024 at 3:26 PM
Many thanks for the kind words and for posting the paper, happy that you liked it!
Thank you for the very helpful review, I don't know which was by you, but they were both very nice and constructive! 😄
January 11, 2024 at 3:16 PM
Thank you for the very helpful review, I don't know which was by you, but they were both very nice and constructive! 😄
One of my all-time favorite papers. It IS vague, but also full of great ideas. I have probably read it at least 20 times over the years, but still keep discovering new things in it.
November 27, 2023 at 3:51 PM
One of my all-time favorite papers. It IS vague, but also full of great ideas. I have probably read it at least 20 times over the years, but still keep discovering new things in it.