Midnight Ambassador
@midnightambassador.bsky.social
He/Himbo, a miscreant with 1000 browser tabs and no idea of how to write a good bio
So now that you have had time to read it in full and review reactions to it, which part of the published immigration bill are you excited about?
November 21, 2025 at 2:42 AM
So now that you have had time to read it in full and review reactions to it, which part of the published immigration bill are you excited about?
I'm not a tankie, and I didn't ask
November 21, 2025 at 2:40 AM
I'm not a tankie, and I didn't ask
Yeah fair cop, I misremembered without checking. I mentioned Palestine first - you had mentioned Ukraine and NATO. My bad.
What is "my type" anyway? Who is "your lot"?
What is "my type" anyway? Who is "your lot"?
November 20, 2025 at 2:23 PM
Yeah fair cop, I misremembered without checking. I mentioned Palestine first - you had mentioned Ukraine and NATO. My bad.
What is "my type" anyway? Who is "your lot"?
What is "my type" anyway? Who is "your lot"?
Tony Vaughan, a Labour backbench MP, said "The rhetoric around these reforms encourages the same culture of divisiveness that sees racism and abuse growing in our communities".
Some two dozen other Labour MPs have endorsed Vaughan, or made their own criticisms public. Leadership contest incoming ✌️
Some two dozen other Labour MPs have endorsed Vaughan, or made their own criticisms public. Leadership contest incoming ✌️
November 20, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Tony Vaughan, a Labour backbench MP, said "The rhetoric around these reforms encourages the same culture of divisiveness that sees racism and abuse growing in our communities".
Some two dozen other Labour MPs have endorsed Vaughan, or made their own criticisms public. Leadership contest incoming ✌️
Some two dozen other Labour MPs have endorsed Vaughan, or made their own criticisms public. Leadership contest incoming ✌️
That would be a thread longer than the draft of the bill, as I object to more parts of the bill than I agree with. Not that you've read it.
I disagree with the very existence of the bill, in total, due to the way it has been introduced, and for the reasons it has been introduced. I am not alone.
I disagree with the very existence of the bill, in total, due to the way it has been introduced, and for the reasons it has been introduced. I am not alone.
November 20, 2025 at 2:16 PM
That would be a thread longer than the draft of the bill, as I object to more parts of the bill than I agree with. Not that you've read it.
I disagree with the very existence of the bill, in total, due to the way it has been introduced, and for the reasons it has been introduced. I am not alone.
I disagree with the very existence of the bill, in total, due to the way it has been introduced, and for the reasons it has been introduced. I am not alone.
I never said it was the only one, and my mentions of other ones can be found in my recent posts and replies. It's the one that YOU mentioned.
November 20, 2025 at 2:06 PM
I never said it was the only one, and my mentions of other ones can be found in my recent posts and replies. It's the one that YOU mentioned.
Go back to brunch!
November 19, 2025 at 10:23 PM
Go back to brunch!
I understand that the United Nations and orgs like MSF & Red Cross know the situation better than either of us, and they're calling it a genocide.
It's not the only issue I care about. Far from it. It is telling though that you chose to focus on it. Do you excuse Starmer's complicity quite often?
It's not the only issue I care about. Far from it. It is telling though that you chose to focus on it. Do you excuse Starmer's complicity quite often?
November 19, 2025 at 10:19 PM
I understand that the United Nations and orgs like MSF & Red Cross know the situation better than either of us, and they're calling it a genocide.
It's not the only issue I care about. Far from it. It is telling though that you chose to focus on it. Do you excuse Starmer's complicity quite often?
It's not the only issue I care about. Far from it. It is telling though that you chose to focus on it. Do you excuse Starmer's complicity quite often?
Oh, so is that that why Starmer is kowtowing to Reform?
November 19, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Oh, so is that that why Starmer is kowtowing to Reform?
To reiterate, your scary hypothetical "great Green policies" aren't actual policies of the Green party. Why try to double down on the lie when called out on it?
November 19, 2025 at 2:02 PM
To reiterate, your scary hypothetical "great Green policies" aren't actual policies of the Green party. Why try to double down on the lie when called out on it?
Why yes.
The quote from Alexandre Auguste Ledru-Rollin reveals the paradoxical nature of leaders frequently having to follow public sentiment rather than authoritatively guiding it.
Not that that pertains to the Greens precisely because policy is voted on by members and not dictated by the leader.
The quote from Alexandre Auguste Ledru-Rollin reveals the paradoxical nature of leaders frequently having to follow public sentiment rather than authoritatively guiding it.
Not that that pertains to the Greens precisely because policy is voted on by members and not dictated by the leader.
November 19, 2025 at 2:01 PM
Why yes.
The quote from Alexandre Auguste Ledru-Rollin reveals the paradoxical nature of leaders frequently having to follow public sentiment rather than authoritatively guiding it.
Not that that pertains to the Greens precisely because policy is voted on by members and not dictated by the leader.
The quote from Alexandre Auguste Ledru-Rollin reveals the paradoxical nature of leaders frequently having to follow public sentiment rather than authoritatively guiding it.
Not that that pertains to the Greens precisely because policy is voted on by members and not dictated by the leader.
I wish he'd step back from life itself.
November 19, 2025 at 11:58 AM
I wish he'd step back from life itself.
That should read: '...Trump wanting America to leave NATO, or about Starmer appeasing him?'*
November 19, 2025 at 11:53 AM
That should read: '...Trump wanting America to leave NATO, or about Starmer appeasing him?'*
So they're not Green policies then.
What a strange way to admit that you're wrong. The leader doesn't pick the policies because the party is actually democratic.
He's not a chump, but even if he was, that beats the Red Tory cunt you're fellating. Do one!
What a strange way to admit that you're wrong. The leader doesn't pick the policies because the party is actually democratic.
He's not a chump, but even if he was, that beats the Red Tory cunt you're fellating. Do one!
November 19, 2025 at 11:30 AM
So they're not Green policies then.
What a strange way to admit that you're wrong. The leader doesn't pick the policies because the party is actually democratic.
He's not a chump, but even if he was, that beats the Red Tory cunt you're fellating. Do one!
What a strange way to admit that you're wrong. The leader doesn't pick the policies because the party is actually democratic.
He's not a chump, but even if he was, that beats the Red Tory cunt you're fellating. Do one!
Yeah, no fucking shit you pleb 😂
Arming and helping prosecute a genocide is a crime against humanity. 'Wow, I mean really, just wow... that you don't give a shit about that.
No thoughts to add about Trump wanting America NATO, or about Trump appeasing him?
Arming and helping prosecute a genocide is a crime against humanity. 'Wow, I mean really, just wow... that you don't give a shit about that.
No thoughts to add about Trump wanting America NATO, or about Trump appeasing him?
November 19, 2025 at 11:28 AM
Yeah, no fucking shit you pleb 😂
Arming and helping prosecute a genocide is a crime against humanity. 'Wow, I mean really, just wow... that you don't give a shit about that.
No thoughts to add about Trump wanting America NATO, or about Trump appeasing him?
Arming and helping prosecute a genocide is a crime against humanity. 'Wow, I mean really, just wow... that you don't give a shit about that.
No thoughts to add about Trump wanting America NATO, or about Trump appeasing him?
I am happy to be proven otherwise that either of those are actual policies destined for the next manifesto.
November 19, 2025 at 2:14 AM
I am happy to be proven otherwise that either of those are actual policies destined for the next manifesto.
Those aren't Green policies to my knowledge. The party membership hasn't voted on either.
Anyway, either hypothetical isn't as bad as Labour's very real practices of arming Israeli genocide and appeasing fascists in America, coincidentally in part so that America doesn't pull out of NATO.
Anyway, either hypothetical isn't as bad as Labour's very real practices of arming Israeli genocide and appeasing fascists in America, coincidentally in part so that America doesn't pull out of NATO.
November 19, 2025 at 2:12 AM
Those aren't Green policies to my knowledge. The party membership hasn't voted on either.
Anyway, either hypothetical isn't as bad as Labour's very real practices of arming Israeli genocide and appeasing fascists in America, coincidentally in part so that America doesn't pull out of NATO.
Anyway, either hypothetical isn't as bad as Labour's very real practices of arming Israeli genocide and appeasing fascists in America, coincidentally in part so that America doesn't pull out of NATO.
To the Green Party of England and Wales you fuel nozzle 😆
November 18, 2025 at 7:18 PM
To the Green Party of England and Wales you fuel nozzle 😆
Huh, that is strange. I blame my fat uncoordinated fingers! That should be corrected now. Thank you for letting me know.
Yes, I think we are talking past each other. We aren't going to change each other's minds. I am baffled and disgusted that you support the policy and I've said what I said.
Yes, I think we are talking past each other. We aren't going to change each other's minds. I am baffled and disgusted that you support the policy and I've said what I said.
November 18, 2025 at 5:24 PM
Huh, that is strange. I blame my fat uncoordinated fingers! That should be corrected now. Thank you for letting me know.
Yes, I think we are talking past each other. We aren't going to change each other's minds. I am baffled and disgusted that you support the policy and I've said what I said.
Yes, I think we are talking past each other. We aren't going to change each other's minds. I am baffled and disgusted that you support the policy and I've said what I said.
How is that related to what we were talking about?
That is whataboutism, plain and simple, and you know it!
I don't see the "Islands of Strangers" speech on there, or the pieces written for The Sun and the Telegraph that follow the right-wing narratives they push instead of challenging them.
That is whataboutism, plain and simple, and you know it!
I don't see the "Islands of Strangers" speech on there, or the pieces written for The Sun and the Telegraph that follow the right-wing narratives they push instead of challenging them.
November 18, 2025 at 5:21 PM
How is that related to what we were talking about?
That is whataboutism, plain and simple, and you know it!
I don't see the "Islands of Strangers" speech on there, or the pieces written for The Sun and the Telegraph that follow the right-wing narratives they push instead of challenging them.
That is whataboutism, plain and simple, and you know it!
I don't see the "Islands of Strangers" speech on there, or the pieces written for The Sun and the Telegraph that follow the right-wing narratives they push instead of challenging them.
Yes, but Labour have been vying for votes from the right since LONG BEFORE this bill. This isn't the first instance of that, is it?
Polls are often used for cynical purposes, you are right. I am cynical of polling in the extreme, so I know, but even I can't deny what they are showing in unison.
Polls are often used for cynical purposes, you are right. I am cynical of polling in the extreme, so I know, but even I can't deny what they are showing in unison.
November 18, 2025 at 5:02 PM
Yes, but Labour have been vying for votes from the right since LONG BEFORE this bill. This isn't the first instance of that, is it?
Polls are often used for cynical purposes, you are right. I am cynical of polling in the extreme, so I know, but even I can't deny what they are showing in unison.
Polls are often used for cynical purposes, you are right. I am cynical of polling in the extreme, so I know, but even I can't deny what they are showing in unison.
Have you not seen any polling this year? Saying that there's no evidence that Labour are turning off their own voters is quite the stretch.
There is plenty of evidence, and Starmer and the cabinet believe it to be valid enough to base their manoeuvring on it. Why do you deny that same evidence?
There is plenty of evidence, and Starmer and the cabinet believe it to be valid enough to base their manoeuvring on it. Why do you deny that same evidence?
November 18, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Have you not seen any polling this year? Saying that there's no evidence that Labour are turning off their own voters is quite the stretch.
There is plenty of evidence, and Starmer and the cabinet believe it to be valid enough to base their manoeuvring on it. Why do you deny that same evidence?
There is plenty of evidence, and Starmer and the cabinet believe it to be valid enough to base their manoeuvring on it. Why do you deny that same evidence?
I said I didn't get my conclusions from the billionaire owned press, which is not the same thing as saying that I did not receive any information from the media.
Also, one can find out what the Labour Party is doing by being a member. The information that led me to leave was emailed to me directly.
Also, one can find out what the Labour Party is doing by being a member. The information that led me to leave was emailed to me directly.
November 18, 2025 at 4:14 PM
I said I didn't get my conclusions from the billionaire owned press, which is not the same thing as saying that I did not receive any information from the media.
Also, one can find out what the Labour Party is doing by being a member. The information that led me to leave was emailed to me directly.
Also, one can find out what the Labour Party is doing by being a member. The information that led me to leave was emailed to me directly.