I read Mississaugas as Mishegas at first, which was very confusing.
November 11, 2025 at 6:25 PM
I read Mississaugas as Mishegas at first, which was very confusing.
Growing up in the 80s I was in the crossover stage—I remember “regular or unleaded” but my family also never had a car that took leaded gas.
November 11, 2025 at 6:22 PM
Growing up in the 80s I was in the crossover stage—I remember “regular or unleaded” but my family also never had a car that took leaded gas.
Thanks for asking. I was wondering the same thing but was afraid to ask.
November 10, 2025 at 7:36 PM
Thanks for asking. I was wondering the same thing but was afraid to ask.
1. Lack of understanding of the (arcane) legislative process.
2. The Democrats holding the line was seen as leverage to get healthcare subsidies. Yesterday’s vote seems like a sign that there are enough Dems to breach the line to move through the next steps more easily.
2. The Democrats holding the line was seen as leverage to get healthcare subsidies. Yesterday’s vote seems like a sign that there are enough Dems to breach the line to move through the next steps more easily.
November 10, 2025 at 3:28 PM
1. Lack of understanding of the (arcane) legislative process.
2. The Democrats holding the line was seen as leverage to get healthcare subsidies. Yesterday’s vote seems like a sign that there are enough Dems to breach the line to move through the next steps more easily.
2. The Democrats holding the line was seen as leverage to get healthcare subsidies. Yesterday’s vote seems like a sign that there are enough Dems to breach the line to move through the next steps more easily.
okay, so, with Dems successfully keeping anyone up in 2026 for voting for this turd let's take a look at who's up in 2026 anyway:
1. Cory Booker - apparently involved behind the scenes, constantly looking for bipartisanship. I don't dislike him personally but he doesn't have what we need. Primary.
1. Cory Booker - apparently involved behind the scenes, constantly looking for bipartisanship. I don't dislike him personally but he doesn't have what we need. Primary.
November 10, 2025 at 1:15 PM
“Oh, Hashem, my man! Didn’t see you over there…how long you been here, dude?”
November 9, 2025 at 4:56 PM
“Oh, Hashem, my man! Didn’t see you over there…how long you been here, dude?”
It’s like he was in the middle of his pity party rant when he realized Gd had walked into the room.
“This sucks! Jerusalem has been abandoned and nothing will ever be good again…but the Lord is the best and will make everything right like always. Amen”
(Edited 10:54 AM via @skeetsapp.com)
“This sucks! Jerusalem has been abandoned and nothing will ever be good again…but the Lord is the best and will make everything right like always. Amen”
(Edited 10:54 AM via @skeetsapp.com)
November 9, 2025 at 4:55 PM
It’s like he was in the middle of his pity party rant when he realized Gd had walked into the room.
“This sucks! Jerusalem has been abandoned and nothing will ever be good again…but the Lord is the best and will make everything right like always. Amen”
(Edited 10:54 AM via @skeetsapp.com)
“This sucks! Jerusalem has been abandoned and nothing will ever be good again…but the Lord is the best and will make everything right like always. Amen”
(Edited 10:54 AM via @skeetsapp.com)
The ram looks way too happy; poor fella has no idea what’s coming his way.
November 8, 2025 at 10:35 PM
The ram looks way too happy; poor fella has no idea what’s coming his way.
The metaphor actually *is* a metaphor found in biblical and ancient texts. The Torah didn’t actually mandate eye gouging.
November 8, 2025 at 1:38 PM
The metaphor actually *is* a metaphor found in biblical and ancient texts. The Torah didn’t actually mandate eye gouging.
Same awesome piece on the new and improved, non-nazi-hosted website.
www.lifeisasacredtext.com/on-the-sin-o...
www.lifeisasacredtext.com/on-the-sin-o...
On the sin of Sodom
Hint: It's not sodomy
www.lifeisasacredtext.com
November 8, 2025 at 1:17 PM
Same awesome piece on the new and improved, non-nazi-hosted website.
www.lifeisasacredtext.com/on-the-sin-o...
www.lifeisasacredtext.com/on-the-sin-o...
It’s no better 1,300 miles south.
November 8, 2025 at 1:04 PM
It’s no better 1,300 miles south.
I don’t know if it’s different because you keep lists, but “Lists Blocking” shows that to me.
November 7, 2025 at 9:49 PM
I don’t know if it’s different because you keep lists, but “Lists Blocking” shows that to me.
You mean the man who can’t travel to 73% of Europe because they want to lock him up?
November 4, 2025 at 6:36 PM
You mean the man who can’t travel to 73% of Europe because they want to lock him up?
Especially if you they were tagged as being on a list you subscribe to so you could reevaluate if you wanted to keep following.
November 4, 2025 at 1:22 PM
Especially if you they were tagged as being on a list you subscribe to so you could reevaluate if you wanted to keep following.
And it’s not “Christian drag.” It’s pretty much gender conforming cis-Christianity, if we must use that analogy.
November 4, 2025 at 1:18 PM
And it’s not “Christian drag.” It’s pretty much gender conforming cis-Christianity, if we must use that analogy.
1. Hard to discover new things.
2. Could spend your life learning about it without if feeling like a waste.
3. applications are without end.
Are any of these controversial statements about math?
Do you know enough about Judaism do determine if they’re controversial statements about Judaism?
2. Could spend your life learning about it without if feeling like a waste.
3. applications are without end.
Are any of these controversial statements about math?
Do you know enough about Judaism do determine if they’re controversial statements about Judaism?
November 3, 2025 at 2:07 PM
1. Hard to discover new things.
2. Could spend your life learning about it without if feeling like a waste.
3. applications are without end.
Are any of these controversial statements about math?
Do you know enough about Judaism do determine if they’re controversial statements about Judaism?
2. Could spend your life learning about it without if feeling like a waste.
3. applications are without end.
Are any of these controversial statements about math?
Do you know enough about Judaism do determine if they’re controversial statements about Judaism?
Ok, I didn’t watch the 70 minute video, but the part you quoted sounds exactly like what “anti-Zionism not antisemitism” *should* sound like.
No mention of Jews or Judaism anywhere.
No mention of Jews or Judaism anywhere.
November 3, 2025 at 3:36 AM
Ok, I didn’t watch the 70 minute video, but the part you quoted sounds exactly like what “anti-Zionism not antisemitism” *should* sound like.
No mention of Jews or Judaism anywhere.
No mention of Jews or Judaism anywhere.
I didn’t realize that Taran and Morgan had separate (and incompatible) fandoms.
November 3, 2025 at 3:18 AM
I didn’t realize that Taran and Morgan had separate (and incompatible) fandoms.