Most of them don't even know the meaning of the word, they just mean "Let me have a little hypocrisy, as a treat"

So it's the accusations of racism you dislike more than the racism?

John you're aware Labour's approach is also populist, aren't you? It's just exclusive rather than inclusive

As per the usual civility rules it's worse to call someone a racist than it is to be a racist

I am 100% pro-refugees, that's why I pay membership fees to the labour party

I mean yeah, that's how party membership works. You don't get to pick and choose

Did you also resign your labour membership, or is that not a redline for you to continue to represent them and pay them membership fees?

You can just phone a landlord when you rent, but that doesn't mean the landlord will do anything

the new policies cross so many red lines that no-one who considers themselves to be an anti racist could in good conscience remain a labour member. at this point the morality of it is as clear cut as could be: remain supporting and working for a party enacting far-right racist policies, or leave

This ☝️

What do you call someone who votes for racists, then?

Why not, John? This comes across as you making excuses

What are the consequences if they ignore you, John?

John you are a labour member and these policies have not proven to be a red line for you. Do you think the conclusion that you have glibly referred to as "name calling" is unreasonable?

Turdy Alex

John, if Keir Starmer came out and said the n-word, then multiple accounts called him racist, would that also look to you to be "organised" or just a lot of people all coming to the same conclusion from what they have observed?

Do they think asylum seekers are riding e-bikes across the channel?

If you feel the need to put woke in your bio, you probably aren't

I recall reading about another government doing something like this to refugees trying to flee