Michelle Meyer
@michellemeyer.bsky.social
PhD/JD. Chair/Assoc Prof, Dept of Bioethics & Decision Sciences; Chief Bioethics Officer; Faculty Co-Dir, Behavioral Insights Team, Geisinger. Ethics, law, judgment & decision-making, especially about health, science & tech. She/her. www.michellenmeyer.com
I missed the llama AND the rooster?! I want a Portland refund
October 25, 2025 at 7:28 PM
I missed the llama AND the rooster?! I want a Portland refund
And you’d try to get the meeting started but with every straggler you’d be interrupted with “Dan” <recorded in exasperated tone> “is joining the call.” (JK I’m sure you never straggled.)
May 10, 2025 at 2:22 PM
And you’d try to get the meeting started but with every straggler you’d be interrupted with “Dan” <recorded in exasperated tone> “is joining the call.” (JK I’m sure you never straggled.)
Location: Danville, PA or (for exceptional candidates) any U.S. location.
Watch for more jobs in the coming days as we grow our Behavioral Insights and Program Evaluation teams! (2/2)
Watch for more jobs in the coming days as we grow our Behavioral Insights and Program Evaluation teams! (2/2)
May 6, 2025 at 5:43 PM
Location: Danville, PA or (for exceptional candidates) any U.S. location.
Watch for more jobs in the coming days as we grow our Behavioral Insights and Program Evaluation teams! (2/2)
Watch for more jobs in the coming days as we grow our Behavioral Insights and Program Evaluation teams! (2/2)
Meanwhile… www.statnews.com/2025/03/17/t...
Eric Green is out as head of National Human Genome Research Institute
The longtime director of the National Human Genome Research Institute is stepping down, as the larger NIH braces for more changes.
www.statnews.com
March 18, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Meanwhile… www.statnews.com/2025/03/17/t...
I also disagree with IRB review of any survey instrument, since all surveys are exempt one way or another—unless the researchers are relying on exemption 2(ii), which depends on the researcher’s claim that survey responses are not sensitive (I’m happy with the IRB vetting that claim independently).
March 11, 2024 at 9:04 PM
I also disagree with IRB review of any survey instrument, since all surveys are exempt one way or another—unless the researchers are relying on exemption 2(ii), which depends on the researcher’s claim that survey responses are not sensitive (I’m happy with the IRB vetting that claim independently).
Of course incomplete disclosure is a nebulous concept since one can never disclose all details of a study. I hope the premise isn’t that randomization fits (2). But IMO disclosure isn’t compelled by (1) either, & the fact that it’s called out by some IRBs might indeed reflect an AB effect of sorts.
March 11, 2024 at 9:00 PM
Of course incomplete disclosure is a nebulous concept since one can never disclose all details of a study. I hope the premise isn’t that randomization fits (2). But IMO disclosure isn’t compelled by (1) either, & the fact that it’s called out by some IRBs might indeed reflect an AB effect of sorts.